• About
  • Contact
Saturday, February 28, 2026
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Why this GOP congressman voted against releasing the Epstein files

by Stefan Becket Caitlin Yilek
November 18, 2025
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Why this GOP congressman voted against releasing the Epstein files

Washington — Republican Rep. Clay Higgins of Louisiana was the only House member to vote against a bill that would require the Justice Department to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein. 

The bill passed the House on Tuesday in a 427-1 vote after months of delay and pushback from GOP leaders. Despite the roadblocks, it achieved overwhelming Republican support to propel it to passage after President Trump dropped his opposition to a vote, opening the door for nearly all GOP members to support it. 

In a post on X, Higgins explained his reasons for opposing the measure, saying the files could inadvertently entangle innocent people if they are released. 

“I have been a principled ‘NO’ on this bill from the beginning. What was wrong with the bill three months ago is still wrong today. It abandons 250 years of criminal justice procedure in America. As written, this bill reveals and injures thousands of innocent people — witnesses, people who provided alibis, family members, etc.,” Higgins wrote. “If enacted in its current form, this type of broad reveal of criminal investigative files, released to a rabid media, will absolutely result in innocent people being hurt. Not by my vote.”

Rep. Clay Higgins of Louisiana speaks to reporters after calling a recess during a House Oversight Subcommittee hearing on federal law enforcement at the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington, D.C., on July 23, 2025.

Rep. Clay Higgins of Louisiana speaks to reporters after calling a recess during a House Oversight Subcommittee hearing on federal law enforcement at the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington, D.C., on July 23, 2025.

Kevin Dietsch / Getty Images


RELATED POSTS

Hegseth declares Anthropic a “supply chain risk to national security”

Trump says he’s “not happy” with progress in Iran negotiations

His concerns echoed those expressed by House Speaker Mike Johnson and others, who argued that the legislative language needed to be changed to prevent the release of information that could compromise investigations or other sensitive material. The bill’s supporters dismissed those concerns and said the bill includes provisions to block such disclosures.

Higgins’ statement continued: “The Oversight Committee is conducting a thorough investigation that has already released well over 60,000 pages of documents from the Epstein case. That effort will continue in a manner that provides all due protections for innocent Americans. If the Senate amends the bill to properly address [the] privacy of victims and other Americans, who are named but not criminally implicated, then I will vote for that bill when it comes back to the House.”

The bill that passed the House requires the Justice Department to release “all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials” regarding Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, his co-conspirator who is serving a 20-year prison sentence. The legislation also requires the disclosure of “[i]ndividuals, including government officials, named or referenced in connection with Epstein’s criminal activities, civil settlements, immunity or plea agreements, or investigatory proceedings,” as well as corporate, academic and governmental entities linked to him.

The measure says that “No record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.”

The legislation allows the attorney general to withhold or redact documents that “contain personally identifiable information of victims or victims’ personal and medical files,” as well as documents whose release would “constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” It also excludes child sexual abuse material, information about ongoing criminal cases and material that could harm national security. Any redactions must be explained in notices to Congress. 

Shortly after the House vote, Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated the upper chamber could take up the matter quickly but is unlikely to make changes that Johnson and Higgins want.

“I think there are some things he’d like to change, but you got a 427 to 1 vote, it’s probably not likely to happen,” the South Dakota Republican said.

More from CBS News


Share6Tweet4Share1

Stefan Becket Caitlin Yilek

Related Posts

Hegseth declares Anthropic a “supply chain risk to national security”
Politics

Hegseth declares Anthropic a “supply chain risk to national security”

February 27, 2026
Trump says he’s “not happy” with progress in Iran negotiations
Politics

Trump says he’s “not happy” with progress in Iran negotiations

February 27, 2026
Scouting America to alter policies to maintain military support, Hegseth says
Politics

Scouting America to alter policies to maintain military support, Hegseth says

February 27, 2026
U.S.-Iran deal is “within our reach,” Omani mediator says
Politics

U.S.-Iran deal is “within our reach,” Omani mediator says

February 27, 2026
Trump orders federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s AI technology
Politics

Trump orders federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s AI technology

February 27, 2026
DOJ says 30 more defendants charged for roles in anti-ICE protest at Minnesota church
Politics

DOJ says 30 more defendants charged for roles in anti-ICE protest at Minnesota church

February 27, 2026
Next Post
McMahon says school aid will keep flowing as Education Department hands off some duties

McMahon says school aid will keep flowing as Education Department hands off some duties

MBS tells Trump Saudis will increase investments in U.S. to near $1 trillion

MBS tells Trump Saudis will increase investments in U.S. to near $1 trillion

Recommended Stories

Trump says he’s considering limited military strike on Iran

Trump says he’s considering limited military strike on Iran

February 20, 2026
Moore says Biden “needed to do more” on immigration, blasts Trump’s crackdown

Moore says Biden “needed to do more” on immigration, blasts Trump’s crackdown

February 13, 2026
Casey Wasserman, 2028 Olympics chair, to sell agency after Epstein files revelation

Casey Wasserman, 2028 Olympics chair, to sell agency after Epstein files revelation

February 14, 2026

Popular Stories

  • Former CDC officials say “we’re not prepared” after more staffing cuts

    Former CDC officials say “we’re not prepared” after more staffing cuts

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs were ruled illegal. What happens now?

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Jack Smith lawyers say basis of ethics probe against him is “imaginary”

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Texas Democratic legislators flee state to protest GOP’s redistricting plan

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump continues Asia tour in Tokyo with Japanese prime minister meeting

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?