• About
  • Contact
Friday, November 6, 2026
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Why this GOP congressman voted against releasing the Epstein files

by Stefan Becket Caitlin Yilek
November 18, 2025
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Why this GOP congressman voted against releasing the Epstein files

Washington — Republican Rep. Clay Higgins of Louisiana was the only House member to vote against a bill that would require the Justice Department to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein. 

The bill passed the House on Tuesday in a 427-1 vote after months of delay and pushback from GOP leaders. Despite the roadblocks, it achieved overwhelming Republican support to propel it to passage after President Trump dropped his opposition to a vote, opening the door for nearly all GOP members to support it. 

In a post on X, Higgins explained his reasons for opposing the measure, saying the files could inadvertently entangle innocent people if they are released. 

“I have been a principled ‘NO’ on this bill from the beginning. What was wrong with the bill three months ago is still wrong today. It abandons 250 years of criminal justice procedure in America. As written, this bill reveals and injures thousands of innocent people — witnesses, people who provided alibis, family members, etc.,” Higgins wrote. “If enacted in its current form, this type of broad reveal of criminal investigative files, released to a rabid media, will absolutely result in innocent people being hurt. Not by my vote.”

Rep. Clay Higgins of Louisiana speaks to reporters after calling a recess during a House Oversight Subcommittee hearing on federal law enforcement at the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington, D.C., on July 23, 2025.

Rep. Clay Higgins of Louisiana speaks to reporters after calling a recess during a House Oversight Subcommittee hearing on federal law enforcement at the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington, D.C., on July 23, 2025.

Kevin Dietsch / Getty Images


RELATED POSTS

Rob Sand’s runway modeling past resurfaces after Iowa gubernatorial win

Jay Rockefeller, former governor and U.S. senator, dies at 89

His concerns echoed those expressed by House Speaker Mike Johnson and others, who argued that the legislative language needed to be changed to prevent the release of information that could compromise investigations or other sensitive material. The bill’s supporters dismissed those concerns and said the bill includes provisions to block such disclosures.

Higgins’ statement continued: “The Oversight Committee is conducting a thorough investigation that has already released well over 60,000 pages of documents from the Epstein case. That effort will continue in a manner that provides all due protections for innocent Americans. If the Senate amends the bill to properly address [the] privacy of victims and other Americans, who are named but not criminally implicated, then I will vote for that bill when it comes back to the House.”

The bill that passed the House requires the Justice Department to release “all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials” regarding Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, his co-conspirator who is serving a 20-year prison sentence. The legislation also requires the disclosure of “[i]ndividuals, including government officials, named or referenced in connection with Epstein’s criminal activities, civil settlements, immunity or plea agreements, or investigatory proceedings,” as well as corporate, academic and governmental entities linked to him.

The measure says that “No record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.”

The legislation allows the attorney general to withhold or redact documents that “contain personally identifiable information of victims or victims’ personal and medical files,” as well as documents whose release would “constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” It also excludes child sexual abuse material, information about ongoing criminal cases and material that could harm national security. Any redactions must be explained in notices to Congress. 

Shortly after the House vote, Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated the upper chamber could take up the matter quickly but is unlikely to make changes that Johnson and Higgins want.

“I think there are some things he’d like to change, but you got a 427 to 1 vote, it’s probably not likely to happen,” the South Dakota Republican said.

More from CBS News


Share6Tweet4Share1

Stefan Becket Caitlin Yilek

Related Posts

Rob Sand’s runway modeling past resurfaces after Iowa gubernatorial win
Politics

Rob Sand’s runway modeling past resurfaces after Iowa gubernatorial win

November 6, 2026
Jay Rockefeller, former governor and U.S. senator, dies at 89
Politics

Jay Rockefeller, former governor and U.S. senator, dies at 89

November 6, 2026
Trump touts imminent decision on potential new attack on Iran
Politics

Trump touts imminent decision on potential new attack on Iran

November 6, 2026
Supreme Court to hear religious liberty case over Colorado preschools
Politics

Democrats could dust off plans for court reforms after capturing Congress

November 6, 2026
Newsom moves to commute all California death sentences
Politics

Newsom moves to commute all California death sentences

November 6, 2026
Judge blocks construction on Trump’s 250-foot arch for now
Politics

Judge blocks construction on Trump’s 250-foot arch for now

November 5, 2026
Next Post
McMahon says school aid will keep flowing as Education Department hands off some duties

McMahon says school aid will keep flowing as Education Department hands off some duties

MBS tells Trump Saudis will increase investments in U.S. to near $1 trillion

MBS tells Trump Saudis will increase investments in U.S. to near $1 trillion

Recommended Stories

Bipartisan senators call Russia diesel deal a “betrayal” of Ukraine

Bipartisan senators call Russia diesel deal a “betrayal” of Ukraine

October 13, 2026
Judge throws out confession by alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

Supreme Court turns away appeal from alleged 9/11 mastermind

October 19, 2026
Bipartisan senators call Russia diesel deal a “betrayal” of Ukraine

Judge blocks Trump’s White House ban targeting CNN, MS NOW and Politico

October 13, 2026

Popular Stories

  • California’s construction industry hurt by ICE raids, builder says

    California’s construction industry hurt by ICE raids, builder says

    189 shares
    Share 76 Tweet 47
  • Attorneys for Rep. Ilhan Omar accuse DOJ of violating judge’s orders

    16 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump decrees any attack on Qatar be treated as threat to U.S.

    35 shares
    Share 14 Tweet 9
  • Supreme Court, in birthright citizenship case, limits use of universal injunctions

    19 shares
    Share 8 Tweet 5
  • Trump picks Katie Zacharia as next White House press secretary

    16 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Not enough quota to unlock this post
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?