• About
  • Contact
Friday, February 27, 2026
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Trump administration sues California for banning agents from wearing face coverings

by Nidia Cavazos
November 17, 2025
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Trump administration sues California for banning agents from wearing face coverings

The Department of Justice is suing California over two recently enacted laws that would prohibit federal agents from wearing facial coverings and require them to identify themselves while conducting their duties. 

The lawsuit argues California’s laws violate the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, under which federal laws take precedence over state laws. The Trump administration also claims the laws threaten the safety of federal officers. 

RELATED POSTS

Scouting America to alter policies to maintain military support, Hegseth says

U.S.-Iran deal is “within our reach,” Omani mediator says

The federal government said in court documents it “does not intend to comply.” 

“Today we filed a lawsuit to strike down California’s unconstitutional law aimed at unmasking the faces of our federal agents, which will allow criminals to dox them,” Bill Essayli, the top federal prosecutor in Los Angeles, wrote on X. “Unconstitutional laws such as this one further endanger our brave men and women protecting our community.” 

A spokesperson for Gov. Gavin Newsom criticized the lawsuit in a statement to CBS News.

“If the Trump administration cared half as much about public safety as it does about pardoning cop-beaters, violating people’s rights, and detaining U.S. citizens and their kids, our communities would be much safer,” spokesperson Diana Crofts-Pelayo wrote. “We’ll see the U.S. Department of Justice in court.”

In September, Newsom signed the “No Secret Police Act” into law. The measure bans federal, state, and local officials from concealing their identity with face coverings while conducting operations. 

The California Highway Patrol would be exempt, as well as undercover operatives, members of SWAT teams and people who have health issues or who need masks for medical reasons like preventing smoke inhalation. 

The lawsuit against California argues the state is discriminating against federal agents as it exempts some state officials from the mask ban. 

Newsom also signed the “No Vigilantes Act” in September, which would require non-uniformed federal agents operating in California to visibly display identification that includes their agency and either a name or badge number starting in January. 

California Democratic state senators pushed for the passage of these bills in June, in response to federal agents wearing face coverings while conducting immigration enforcement operations across California. 

Both laws would impose criminal penalties on federal law enforcement officers for noncompliance in some cases. 

Critics of the facial covering ban, including the California Association of Highway Patrolmen, argue it would put officers and their families’ lives and well-being at risk by prohibiting them from protecting their identity when needed. State-level critics also say it would only serve to punish local law enforcement for the actions of federal agents.

The Department of Homeland Security called on Newsom to veto the bills in September and, upon passage, stated it would not comply. 

“To be clear: We will NOT comply with Gavin Newsom’s unconstitutional mask ban,” DHS posted on X in September that called the law a “PR stunt.”

In June, a federal version of the “No Secret Police Act” was introduced by New York Democratic Reps. Dan Goldman and Adriano Espaillat. This act would also ban facial coverings and require law enforcement officers and DHS agents to clearly display identification and insignia when detaining individuals. 

CBS News has reached out to California Attorney General Rob Bonta for comment. 


Share6Tweet4Share1

Nidia Cavazos

Related Posts

Scouting America to alter policies to maintain military support, Hegseth says
Politics

Scouting America to alter policies to maintain military support, Hegseth says

February 27, 2026
U.S.-Iran deal is “within our reach,” Omani mediator says
Politics

U.S.-Iran deal is “within our reach,” Omani mediator says

February 27, 2026
Trump orders federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s AI technology
Politics

Trump orders federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s AI technology

February 27, 2026
DOJ says 30 more defendants charged for roles in anti-ICE protest at Minnesota church
Politics

DOJ says 30 more defendants charged for roles in anti-ICE protest at Minnesota church

February 27, 2026
FBI’s head of congressional affairs stepping down, sources say
Politics

About a dozen FBI staff who worked on Trump documents case fired, sources say

February 27, 2026
American among those killed on speedboat in Cuban waters, White House confirms
Politics

American among those killed on speedboat in Cuban waters, White House confirms

February 27, 2026
Next Post
Larry Summers says he’s “stepping back from public commitments” over Epstein emails

Larry Summers says he's "stepping back from public commitments" over Epstein emails

Trump has elaborate welcome planned for Saudi crown prince’s White House visit

Trump has elaborate welcome planned for Saudi crown prince's White House visit

Recommended Stories

Senate to vote on advancing funding bills as Democrats push for ICE reforms

Senate to vote on advancing funding bills as Democrats push for ICE reforms

January 29, 2026
Trump pardons 5 ex-NFL players for crimes including drug trafficking

Trump pardons 5 ex-NFL players for crimes including drug trafficking

February 13, 2026
Democrats in Congress press National Park Service on Trump ballroom donors

Democrats in Congress press National Park Service on Trump ballroom donors

February 19, 2026

Popular Stories

  • Former CDC officials say “we’re not prepared” after more staffing cuts

    Former CDC officials say “we’re not prepared” after more staffing cuts

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs were ruled illegal. What happens now?

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Jack Smith lawyers say basis of ethics probe against him is “imaginary”

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Texas Democratic legislators flee state to protest GOP’s redistricting plan

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump continues Asia tour in Tokyo with Japanese prime minister meeting

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?