• About
  • Contact
Thursday, October 8, 2026
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Trump administration sues California for banning agents from wearing face coverings

by Nidia Cavazos
November 17, 2025
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Trump administration sues California for banning agents from wearing face coverings

The Department of Justice is suing California over two recently enacted laws that would prohibit federal agents from wearing facial coverings and require them to identify themselves while conducting their duties. 

The lawsuit argues California’s laws violate the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, under which federal laws take precedence over state laws. The Trump administration also claims the laws threaten the safety of federal officers. 

RELATED POSTS

FDA says its abortion pill safety review will continue into next year

Stephen Miller spoke at FBI training on domestic terrorism, sources say

The federal government said in court documents it “does not intend to comply.” 

“Today we filed a lawsuit to strike down California’s unconstitutional law aimed at unmasking the faces of our federal agents, which will allow criminals to dox them,” Bill Essayli, the top federal prosecutor in Los Angeles, wrote on X. “Unconstitutional laws such as this one further endanger our brave men and women protecting our community.” 

A spokesperson for Gov. Gavin Newsom criticized the lawsuit in a statement to CBS News.

“If the Trump administration cared half as much about public safety as it does about pardoning cop-beaters, violating people’s rights, and detaining U.S. citizens and their kids, our communities would be much safer,” spokesperson Diana Crofts-Pelayo wrote. “We’ll see the U.S. Department of Justice in court.”

In September, Newsom signed the “No Secret Police Act” into law. The measure bans federal, state, and local officials from concealing their identity with face coverings while conducting operations. 

The California Highway Patrol would be exempt, as well as undercover operatives, members of SWAT teams and people who have health issues or who need masks for medical reasons like preventing smoke inhalation. 

The lawsuit against California argues the state is discriminating against federal agents as it exempts some state officials from the mask ban. 

Newsom also signed the “No Vigilantes Act” in September, which would require non-uniformed federal agents operating in California to visibly display identification that includes their agency and either a name or badge number starting in January. 

California Democratic state senators pushed for the passage of these bills in June, in response to federal agents wearing face coverings while conducting immigration enforcement operations across California. 

Both laws would impose criminal penalties on federal law enforcement officers for noncompliance in some cases. 

Critics of the facial covering ban, including the California Association of Highway Patrolmen, argue it would put officers and their families’ lives and well-being at risk by prohibiting them from protecting their identity when needed. State-level critics also say it would only serve to punish local law enforcement for the actions of federal agents.

The Department of Homeland Security called on Newsom to veto the bills in September and, upon passage, stated it would not comply. 

“To be clear: We will NOT comply with Gavin Newsom’s unconstitutional mask ban,” DHS posted on X in September that called the law a “PR stunt.”

In June, a federal version of the “No Secret Police Act” was introduced by New York Democratic Reps. Dan Goldman and Adriano Espaillat. This act would also ban facial coverings and require law enforcement officers and DHS agents to clearly display identification and insignia when detaining individuals. 

CBS News has reached out to California Attorney General Rob Bonta for comment. 


Share6Tweet4Share1

Nidia Cavazos

Related Posts

FDA says its abortion pill safety review will continue into next year
Politics

FDA says its abortion pill safety review will continue into next year

October 8, 2026
Activist who protested outside Stephen Miller’s home won’t face state charges
Politics

Stephen Miller spoke at FBI training on domestic terrorism, sources say

October 8, 2026
CNN, MS NOW, Politico due back in court to fight White House ban
Politics

CNN, MS NOW, Politico due back in court to fight White House ban

October 8, 2026
Fears about kids’ online safety unite Democrats and Republicans
Politics

Fears about kids’ online safety unite Democrats and Republicans

October 8, 2026
Democrats invest more heavily in Gina Hinojosa as Pritzker offers support
Politics

Democrats invest more heavily in Gina Hinojosa as Pritzker offers support

October 7, 2026
Obama hosts fundraiser with Senate Democrats weeks before midterms
Politics

Obama hosts fundraiser with Senate Democrats weeks before midterms

October 7, 2026
Next Post
Larry Summers says he’s “stepping back from public commitments” over Epstein emails

Larry Summers says he's "stepping back from public commitments" over Epstein emails

Trump has elaborate welcome planned for Saudi crown prince’s White House visit

Trump has elaborate welcome planned for Saudi crown prince's White House visit

Recommended Stories

Homan defends ICE crackdown: “Give me an example of where we went too far”

Homan defends ICE crackdown: “Give me an example of where we went too far”

October 1, 2026
What is the White House press pool and how does it work?

What is the White House press pool and how does it work?

September 22, 2026
9/21: The Takeout with Major Garrett

9/21: The Takeout with Major Garrett

September 21, 2026

Popular Stories

  • California’s construction industry hurt by ICE raids, builder says

    California’s construction industry hurt by ICE raids, builder says

    155 shares
    Share 62 Tweet 39
  • Bills-Chiefs game is most-watched TV program since Super Bowl

    16 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Delaware holds U.S. Senate primary and more races to watch today

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Sen. John Fetterman says it’s “entirely possible” Democrats take back Senate

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Head of Eisenhower library resigns after sword spat with Trump administration

    16 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Not enough quota to unlock this post
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?