• About
  • Contact
Tuesday, February 3, 2026
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

North Dakota’s high court restores state abortion ban

by Jake Ryan
November 21, 2025
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0
North Dakota’s high court restores state abortion ban

Abortion is again illegal in North Dakota after the state’s Supreme Court on Friday couldn’t muster the required majority to uphold a judge’s ruling that struck down the state’s ban last year.

The 2023 law makes it a felony crime for anyone to perform an abortion, though it specifically protects patients from prosecution. Doctors could be prosecuted and penalized by as much as five years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

Three justices agreed that the ban is unconstitutionally vague under the state constitution. The other two justices said the law is not unconstitutional.

The state constitution requires at least four of the five justices to agree for a law to be found unconstitutional, a high bar. Not enough members of the court joined together to affirm the lower court ruling.

In his opinion, Justice Jerod Tufte said the natural rights guaranteed by the state constitution in 1889 do not extend to abortion rights. He also said the law “provides adequate and fair warning to those attempting to comply.”

North Dakota Republican Attorney Drew Wrigley welcomed the ruling, saying, “The Supreme Court has upheld this important pro-life legislation, enacted by the people’s Legislature. The Attorney General’s office has the solemn responsibility of defending the laws of North Dakota, and today those laws have been upheld.”

Republican state Sen. Janne Myrdal, who introduced the 2023 legislation that became the law banning abortion, said she is “thrilled and grateful that two justices that are highly respected saw the truth of the matter, that this is fully constitutional for the mother and for the unborn child and thereafter for that sake.”

Attorneys for the challengers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The ruling means access to abortion in North Dakota will be outlawed. Even after a judge had earlier struck down the ban last year, the only scenarios for a patient to obtain an abortion in North Dakota had been for life- or health-preserving reasons in a hospital.

The only abortion provider relocated in 2022 from Fargo to nearby Moorhead, Minnesota.

Justice Daniel Crothers, one of the three judges to vote against the ban, wrote that the district court decision wasn’t wrong.

“The vagueness in the law relates to when an abortion can be performed to preserve the life and health of the mother,” Crothers wrote. “After striking this invalid provision, the remaining portions of the law would be inoperable.”

North Dakota supreme court

North Dakota Supreme Court Chief Justice Jon Jensen, center, addresses new lawyers during a ceremony. The other justices are, from left, Douglas Bahr, Daniel Crothers, Lisa Fair McEvers and Jerod Tufte.

RELATED POSTS

Top Minnesota corrections official questions when immigration agencies will draw down forces

Clintons will testify in Epstein probe after contempt threat, House panel says

Jack Dura / AP


North Dakota’s newly confirmed ban prohibits the performance of an abortion as a felony crime. The only exceptions are for rape or incest in the first six weeks — before many women know they are pregnant — and to prevent the mother’s death or a “serious health risk” to her.

North Dakota joins 12 other states enforcing bans on abortion at all stages of pregnancy. Another four bar it at or around six weeks gestational age.

Judge Bruce Romanick had struck down the ban the state Legislature passed in 2023, less than a year after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and opened the door to the state-level bans, largely turning the abortion battle to state courts and legislatures.

The Red River Women’s Clinic — the formerly sole abortion clinic in North Dakota — and several physicians challenged the law. The state appealed the 2024 ruling that overturned the ban.

The judge and the Supreme Court each denied requests by the state to keep the abortion ban in effect during the appeal. Those decisions allowed patients with pregnancy complications to seek care without fear of delay because of the law, Center for Reproductive Rights Staff Attorney Meetra Mehdizadeh previously said.

The Battle Over Abortion

More


Share6Tweet4Share1

Jake Ryan

Jake Ryan is a social media manager and journalist based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. When he's not playing rust, he's either tweeting, walking, or writing about Oklahoma stuff.

Related Posts

Top Minnesota corrections official questions when immigration agencies will draw down forces
Politics

Top Minnesota corrections official questions when immigration agencies will draw down forces

February 3, 2026
Clintons will testify in Epstein probe after contempt threat, House panel says
Politics

Clintons will testify in Epstein probe after contempt threat, House panel says

February 3, 2026
Watchdog shares whistleblower complaint involving Gabbard with Congress after delay
Politics

Watchdog shares whistleblower complaint involving Gabbard with Congress after delay

February 3, 2026
House committee report accuses DHS of Good, Pretti killings cover-up
Politics

House committee report accuses DHS of Good, Pretti killings cover-up

February 3, 2026
Virginia Giuffre’s family criticizes DOJ in handling of Epstein files
Politics

Virginia Giuffre’s family criticizes DOJ in handling of Epstein files

February 3, 2026
Trump says his administration is seeking $1 billion in talks with Harvard
Politics

Trump says his administration is seeking $1 billion in talks with Harvard

February 3, 2026
Next Post
Trump praises Mamdani after White House meeting: “I want him to do a great job”

Trump praises Mamdani after White House meeting: "I want him to do a great job"

Supreme Court halts ruling that tossed out Texas’ House maps — for now

Supreme Court halts ruling that tossed out Texas' House maps — for now

Recommended Stories

Senate to vote on advancing funding bills as Democrats push for ICE reforms

Senate reaches deal ahead of shutdown deadline to fund government, continue ICE talks

January 29, 2026
General strike, rally, marches in Minnesota Friday to protest ICE

General strike, rally, marches in Minnesota Friday to protest ICE

January 23, 2026
Breaking down Supreme Court arguments on transgender athlete bans

Breaking down Supreme Court arguments on transgender athlete bans

January 14, 2026

Popular Stories

  • How the Trump administration’s account of boat strike has evolved

    How the Trump administration’s account of boat strike has evolved

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump administration ending protected status for South Sudanese nationals

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • U.S. strikes 4 more alleged drug boats in Pacific, killing 14

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Rubio says release of hostages from Gaza is “most emergent and immediate phase” of Trump peace plan

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Health centers face risks as government funding lapses

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?