• About
  • Contact
Wednesday, November 4, 2026
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Justice Dept. moves to dismiss Jan. 6 class action lawsuit

by Jacob Rosen
August 3, 2026
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
Justice Dept. moves to dismiss Jan. 6 class action lawsuit

RELATED POSTS

Sen. Amy Klobuchar wins Minnesota governor’s race, CBS News projects

Trump asking advisers if Hegseth should go, sources say


The Justice Department moved Monday to dismiss a class action lawsuit brought by Jan. 6 defendants under the Federal Tort Claims Act, arguing that the claims brought by the rioters are prohibited because they were filed after the statute of limitations had expired.

“All the claims in the Complaint are ‘forever barred’ due to the failure to timely file the administrative claim with the agency,” the Justice Department said in its filing.

The plaintiffs complained of injuries they had suffered on Jan. 6, 2021, due to “excessive police force.” The Justice Department said that the plaintiffs submitted forms that “were only partially completed” and said some lacked signatures and supporting documentation.  

Also, under the FTCA, plaintiffs have two years to bring a lawsuit, and there are a few additional deadlines that must be met in order to sue the federal government under the FTCA. The Justice Department noted that the plaintiffs alleged “that they were injured by the police actions that occurred on January 6, 2021.” Therefore, the department said in its filing, the rioters had until Jan. 6, 2023, to sue the federal government under the Act.

The Justice Department pointed out that the “earliest claim of the Named Plaintiffs was dated July 29, 2025,” well beyond two-year period allowed under the FTCA.

The department argued that the plaintiffs “knew that they were injured and knew who injured them, but they instead chose to wait until well past the deadline to file the claims.” 

On Sunday evening, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche issued an order rescinding a $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund that was meant to compensate allies of President Trump. The order, however, does not include language that would bar government restitution or payouts to convicted Jan. 6 rioters. 

A former Justice Department lawyer said Blanche’s unilateral rescission of the “anti-weaponization” fund has no legal effect and doesn’t prevent the fund from being revived in the future.

Assault On The U.S. Capitol

More


Go deeper with The Free Press

In:

Share6Tweet4Share1

Jacob Rosen

Related Posts

Sen. Klobuchar projected winner of DFL primary in Minnesota governor’s race
Politics

Sen. Amy Klobuchar wins Minnesota governor’s race, CBS News projects

November 4, 2026
Trump asking advisers if Hegseth should go, sources say
Politics

Trump asking advisers if Hegseth should go, sources say

November 4, 2026
CBS News exit polls show how Democrats won in the midterms
Politics

CBS News exit polls show how Democrats won in the midterms

November 4, 2026
Melat Kiros becomes first woman from Gen Z elected to Congress
Politics

Melat Kiros becomes first woman from Gen Z elected to Congress

November 4, 2026
Democrat Rosenthal wins ugly race for Texas railroad commissioner
Politics

Democrat Rosenthal wins ugly race for Texas railroad commissioner

November 4, 2026
Pete Ricketts wins Nebraska Senate election, CBS News projects
Politics

Pete Ricketts wins Nebraska Senate election, CBS News projects

November 4, 2026
Next Post
Senate candidate El-Sayed questions assumption Michigan voters are moderates

Senate candidate El-Sayed questions assumption Michigan voters are moderates

More Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool charges dropped by Pirro’s office

More Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool charges dropped by Pirro's office

Recommended Stories

Trump says he’s “looking at” firing Kimberly Guilfoyle

Trump says he’s “looking at” firing Kimberly Guilfoyle

October 12, 2026
Elon Musk’s Starlink and Starshield, and what they mean to Ukraine

Elon Musk’s Starlink and Starshield, and what they mean to Ukraine

October 21, 2026
Judge chastises DOJ after 430 trees cut down at D.C. golf course

Judge chastises DOJ after 430 trees cut down at D.C. golf course

October 12, 2026

Popular Stories

  • California’s construction industry hurt by ICE raids, builder says

    California’s construction industry hurt by ICE raids, builder says

    187 shares
    Share 75 Tweet 47
  • Attorneys for Rep. Ilhan Omar accuse DOJ of violating judge’s orders

    16 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump picks Katie Zacharia as next White House press secretary

    16 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump decrees any attack on Qatar be treated as threat to U.S.

    35 shares
    Share 14 Tweet 9
  • Supreme Court, in birthright citizenship case, limits use of universal injunctions

    19 shares
    Share 8 Tweet 5
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Not enough quota to unlock this post
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?