• About
  • Contact
Sunday, September 20, 2026
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Justice Dept. moves to dismiss Jan. 6 class action lawsuit

by Jacob Rosen
August 3, 2026
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
Justice Dept. moves to dismiss Jan. 6 class action lawsuit

RELATED POSTS

Bessent meets with Chinese counterpart ahead of Trump-Xi summit

Cassidy: Trump needs to be “radically honest” on vaccines amid measles outbreak


The Justice Department moved Monday to dismiss a class action lawsuit brought by Jan. 6 defendants under the Federal Tort Claims Act, arguing that the claims brought by the rioters are prohibited because they were filed after the statute of limitations had expired.

“All the claims in the Complaint are ‘forever barred’ due to the failure to timely file the administrative claim with the agency,” the Justice Department said in its filing.

The plaintiffs complained of injuries they had suffered on Jan. 6, 2021, due to “excessive police force.” The Justice Department said that the plaintiffs submitted forms that “were only partially completed” and said some lacked signatures and supporting documentation.  

Also, under the FTCA, plaintiffs have two years to bring a lawsuit, and there are a few additional deadlines that must be met in order to sue the federal government under the FTCA. The Justice Department noted that the plaintiffs alleged “that they were injured by the police actions that occurred on January 6, 2021.” Therefore, the department said in its filing, the rioters had until Jan. 6, 2023, to sue the federal government under the Act.

The Justice Department pointed out that the “earliest claim of the Named Plaintiffs was dated July 29, 2025,” well beyond two-year period allowed under the FTCA.

The department argued that the plaintiffs “knew that they were injured and knew who injured them, but they instead chose to wait until well past the deadline to file the claims.” 

On Sunday evening, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche issued an order rescinding a $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund that was meant to compensate allies of President Trump. The order, however, does not include language that would bar government restitution or payouts to convicted Jan. 6 rioters. 

A former Justice Department lawyer said Blanche’s unilateral rescission of the “anti-weaponization” fund has no legal effect and doesn’t prevent the fund from being revived in the future.

Assault On The U.S. Capitol

More


Go deeper with The Free Press

In:

Share6Tweet4Share1

Jacob Rosen

Related Posts

Bessent meets with Chinese counterpart ahead of Trump-Xi summit
Politics

Bessent meets with Chinese counterpart ahead of Trump-Xi summit

September 20, 2026
Cassidy: Trump needs to be “radically honest” on vaccines amid measles outbreak
Politics

Cassidy: Trump needs to be “radically honest” on vaccines amid measles outbreak

September 20, 2026
Trump to meet Mamdani tomorrow in New York City
Politics

Trump to meet Mamdani tomorrow in New York City

September 20, 2026
Democrat Andy Beshear on pursuing “The Great American Reset”
Politics

Democrat Andy Beshear on pursuing “The Great American Reset”

September 20, 2026
Trump says proposed arch will also be a “top grade Military Complex”
Politics

Trump says proposed arch will also be a “top grade Military Complex”

September 20, 2026
4 killed in U.S. strike on alleged drug-smuggling boat in Caribbean, Pentagon says
Politics

4 killed in U.S. strike on alleged drug-smuggling boat in Caribbean, Pentagon says

September 19, 2026
Next Post
Senate candidate El-Sayed questions assumption Michigan voters are moderates

Senate candidate El-Sayed questions assumption Michigan voters are moderates

More Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool charges dropped by Pirro’s office

More Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool charges dropped by Pirro's office

Recommended Stories

Trump lashes out at judges ruling against his priorities, pet projects

Trump lashes out at judges ruling against his priorities, pet projects

September 15, 2026
Judge extends block on Postal Service’s new Trump-backed mail-in ballot requirements

Judge extends block on Postal Service’s new Trump-backed mail-in ballot requirements

September 4, 2026
8/26: The Takeout with Major Garrett

8/26: The Takeout with Major Garrett

August 26, 2026

Popular Stories

  • California’s construction industry hurt by ICE raids, builder says

    California’s construction industry hurt by ICE raids, builder says

    141 shares
    Share 56 Tweet 35
  • Trump decrees any attack on Qatar be treated as threat to U.S.

    31 shares
    Share 12 Tweet 8
  • Trump administration asks Supreme Court to allow use of citizenship database

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Bills-Chiefs game is most-watched TV program since Super Bowl

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • 9/7: CBS Evening News

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Not enough quota to unlock this post
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?