• About
  • Contact
Friday, November 6, 2026
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Comey appears in court after his indictment for allegedly threatening Trump

by Jacob Rosen
April 29, 2026
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Comey appears in court after his indictment for allegedly threatening Trump

RELATED POSTS

Newsom moves to commute all California death sentences

Judge blocks construction on Trump’s 250-foot arch for now

Former FBI Director James Comey made his first court appearance Wednesday after his indictment a day earlier for allegedly making threats against President Trump.

He did not enter a plea on Wednesday. Federal Magistrate Judge William E. Fitzpatrick read the charges against Comey and denied the Justice Department’s attempts to set conditions of release. 

“I don’t think conditions on release are necessary in this case,” Fitzpatrick said, adding that “they weren’t necessary last time” Comey was indicted. 

Comey, in a blue suit and light blue dress shirt, was represented by Patrick Fitzgerald and Jessica Carmichael. He nodded as he was read his rights and smiled back at his family as he left the courtroom.

Comey has been charged with two counts: knowingly and willfully making a threat to take the life of — and to inflict bodily harm on — the president, and second, knowingly and willfully transmitting in interstate commerce a threat to kill the president. 

The charges stem from an image he briefly shared to Instagram last year showing seashells arranged in the sand to form the numbers “86 47.” The indictment states that a “reasonable recipient who is familiar with the circumstances” would interpret the depiction of the shells in the photo “as a serious expression of an intent to do harm to President Trump.”

Comey, a frequent Trump critic, soon removed the post after outraged Trump supporters interpreted the numbers as a threat against Mr. Trump, the 47th president. He said in an Instagram post that he believed the shell formation was communicating a “political message.” 

“I didn’t realize some folks associate those numbers with violence,” Comey wrote. “It never occurred to me but I oppose violence of any kind so I took the post down.”

In a video posted on Substack after the indictment, Comey said, “”I’m still innocent, I’m still not afraid, and I still believe in the independent federal judiciary. So, let’s go.”

In a post to Truth Social late Wednesday night, President Trump wrote, “’86’ is a mob term for ‘kill him.’ They say 86 him! 86 47 means ‘kill President Trump.’ James Comey, who is a Dirty Cop, one of the worst, knows this full well! EIGHT MILES OUT, SIX FEET DOWN! Didn’t he also lie to the FBI about this??? I think so!”

Comey’s attorney, Patrick Fitzgerald, said his legal team intend to file motions to dismiss on the grounds of selective and vindictive prosecutions imminently and asked a judge to order the preservation of records from the government, given the Justice Department’s recent opinion that the Presidential Records Act does not apply to the Trump administration.

Comey was previously indicted by a federal grand jury in September 2025 for allegedly lying to Congress and obstructing a congressional proceeding. In that case, his legal team presented arguments on selective and vindictive prosecutions, but the judge never had to rule on that issue because the case was dismissed on grounds that the U.S. attorney who had brought the case was illegally appointed. The original case is being appealed by the Justice Department. 

CBS News legal contributor Jessica Levinson told CBS News that the charges in the second indictment are unusual in that they stem from a symbolic message: “They’re based on seashells.” She indicated the Justice Department would face a high bar in prosecuting the case, noting that the biggest issue is whether there’s a First Amendment defense in the case.

“There’s a robust First Amendment defense if you can’t show that either the speech, or the symbolic speech or the expression satisfies that intent requirement.” The Justice Department will have to prove that Comey intended to threaten the president’s life or that he intended to transmit a message with that threat in his social media post. 

In 2023, the Supreme Court said that for a true threat to be considered speech that is unprotected under the First Amendment, the government must show that the speaker “consciously disregards a significant risk that their words might harm another.” Comey said at the time of his Instagram post that he didn’t understand the numbers could be associated with violence and then removed the post.

Melissa Quinn

contributed to this report.

More from CBS News

Go deeper with The Free Press

In:

Share6Tweet4Share1

Jacob Rosen

Related Posts

Newsom moves to commute all California death sentences
Politics

Newsom moves to commute all California death sentences

November 6, 2026
Judge blocks construction on Trump’s 250-foot arch for now
Politics

Judge blocks construction on Trump’s 250-foot arch for now

November 5, 2026
Why did Republicans lose the midterms? GOP soul-searching begins.
Politics

Why did Republicans lose the midterms? GOP soul-searching begins.

November 5, 2026
Harmeet Dhillon, DOJ’s controversial civil rights chief, resigns
Politics

Harmeet Dhillon, DOJ’s controversial civil rights chief, resigns

November 5, 2026
Black candidates for governor make history with midterm victories
Politics

Black candidates for governor make history with midterm victories

November 5, 2026
Trump to attend Army-Navy football game next month, officials say
Politics

Trump to attend Army-Navy football game next month, officials say

November 5, 2026
Next Post
RFK Jr.’s healthy food agenda puts hospitals on notice about patients’ meals

RFK Jr.'s healthy food agenda puts hospitals on notice about patients' meals

As Iran war nears key 60-day deadline, Congress and Trump face choices

As Iran war nears key 60-day deadline, Congress and Trump face choices

Recommended Stories

Sanders says GOP rhetoric about El-Sayed “should appall” Americans

Sanders says GOP rhetoric about El-Sayed “should appall” Americans

November 1, 2026
Midterm Updates: Trump reverses course on canceling rallies

Midterm Updates: Trump reverses course on canceling rallies

October 30, 2026
Trump’s lawyers to argue appeal in “hush money” case

Trump’s lawyers to argue appeal in “hush money” case

November 5, 2026

Popular Stories

  • California’s construction industry hurt by ICE raids, builder says

    California’s construction industry hurt by ICE raids, builder says

    189 shares
    Share 76 Tweet 47
  • Attorneys for Rep. Ilhan Omar accuse DOJ of violating judge’s orders

    16 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump decrees any attack on Qatar be treated as threat to U.S.

    35 shares
    Share 14 Tweet 9
  • Supreme Court, in birthright citizenship case, limits use of universal injunctions

    19 shares
    Share 8 Tweet 5
  • Trump picks Katie Zacharia as next White House press secretary

    16 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Not enough quota to unlock this post
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?