• About
  • Contact
Tuesday, October 20, 2026
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Appeals court temporarily blocks DOJ release of Biden tapes with biographer

by Melissa Quinn
July 10, 2026
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Appeals court temporarily blocks DOJ release of Biden tapes with biographer

Washington — A federal appeals court temporarily blocked the Justice Department from turning over to a conservative think tank redacted transcripts and audio recordings of conversations former President Joe Biden had with his biographer roughly a decade ago.

A panel of three judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed to issue an administrative injunction that stops the release of the material to the Heritage Foundation for 10 days. 

RELATED POSTS

Trump says U.S. will pay fraud whistleblowers, and he’ll decide who is paid

Khanna to campaign in Nebraska with Senate candidate Dan Osborn

The court said in a brief unsigned order that the purpose of its injunction, which expires at 11:59 p.m. on July 20, is to “give the court sufficient opportunity to consider the emergency motion for an injunction pending appeal and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion.”

The recordings at issue in the legal fight date back to 2016 and 2017, when Biden sat down with his biographer, Mark Zwonitzer, for his memoir, “Promise Me, Dad.” But they gained interest from the Heritage Foundation several years later following an investigation by former special counsel Robert Hur into Biden’s handling of sensitive government records after his vice presidency, which ended in 2017. The former president was not charged with any crimes stemming from Hur’s investigation.

The special counsel’s report, released in 2024, included passages that referenced Biden’s conversations with Zwonitzer. The special counsel wrote the recordings showed the former president’s “diminished faculties and faulty memory,” and said his conversations with Zwonitzer were “painfully slow, with Mr. Biden struggling to remember events and straining at times to read and relay his own notebook entries.”

Soon after Hur’s report was released, the Heritage Foundation filed a public records request for material the special counsel relied on to write specific portions of the report, including the excerpts that referred to Zwonitzer’s recorded conversations with Biden.

The Justice Department initially withheld the audio tapes and most of the written transcripts, citing certain exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act. But once President Trump returned to the White House, the department said it intended to provide the material to Congress and the Heritage Foundation.

Biden moved to intervene in a lawsuit the Heritage Foundation had filed in 2024 to force the release of the transcripts and tapes. But last month, a federal judge initially rejected a request from the former president to block the disclosure.

Shortly after she issued her decision, the judge, Dabney Friedrich, agreed to stop the Trump administration from releasing the information for three weeks to give the D.C. Circuit time to decide whether to take action itself. That order was set to expire at 5 p.m. Friday.

Biden’s lawyers had argued to the D.C. Circuit that disseminating his discussions with Zwonitzer would be harmful and likened their disclosure to the public release of diary entries or private text messages. 

“The private conversations at issue were never intended to be shared with a wider audience, and the Department has them only because it collected the recordings as part of a criminal investigation that resulted in no charges,” they argued in a filing.

Biden’s legal team also said there is no immediate need for the Heritage Foundation to access the material.

“This FOIA action has been pending for nearly two and a half years, and there is no meaningful public interest — let alone one that must be satisfied in the immediate days or weeks — in the disclosure of decade-old conversations of a former President who is now a private citizen, and who neither holds nor is seeking public office,” they said.

But the Justice Department said the public has an interest in seeing the information that Hur relied on during the course of his investigation.

“Releasing the materials will allow the public to assess the persuasiveness of Hur’s determinations,” department lawyers told the D.C. Circuit in court papers.

More from CBS News

Go deeper with The Free Press


Share6Tweet4Share1

Melissa Quinn

Related Posts

Trump says U.S. will pay fraud whistleblowers, and he’ll decide who is paid
Politics

Trump says U.S. will pay fraud whistleblowers, and he’ll decide who is paid

October 20, 2026
Khanna to campaign in Nebraska with Senate candidate Dan Osborn
Politics

Khanna to campaign in Nebraska with Senate candidate Dan Osborn

October 20, 2026
3 more Democrats slated to join summit on political future
Politics

3 more Democrats slated to join summit on political future

October 20, 2026
Trump proposes gas tax holiday, but savings may be limited
Politics

Trump announces $8 billion in diesel relief for U.S. farmers

October 20, 2026
Dems demand tougher standards for companies running Medicaid systems
Politics

Dems demand tougher standards for companies running Medicaid systems

October 20, 2026
Hegseth meets Netanyahu ahead of elections, possible Iran war restart
Politics

Hegseth meets Netanyahu ahead of elections, possible Iran war restart

October 19, 2026
Next Post
White House considering plan to add permanent fencing on Pennsylvania Ave.

White House considering plan to add permanent fencing on Pennsylvania Ave.

Graham Platner formally drops out of Maine Senate race

Graham Platner formally drops out of Maine Senate race

Recommended Stories

National Guardsman injured in shooting in Washington, D.C.

National Guardsman injured in shooting in Washington, D.C.

October 19, 2026
Supreme Court to hear dispute over Trump’s mandatory detention policy

Supreme Court to hear dispute over Trump’s mandatory detention policy

October 1, 2026
Trump suggests letting Iran “take out” LA, San Diego during rally

Trump suggests letting Iran “take out” LA, San Diego during rally

October 6, 2026

Popular Stories

  • California’s construction industry hurt by ICE raids, builder says

    California’s construction industry hurt by ICE raids, builder says

    166 shares
    Share 66 Tweet 42
  • Trump decrees any attack on Qatar be treated as threat to U.S.

    33 shares
    Share 13 Tweet 8
  • Supreme Court, in birthright citizenship case, limits use of universal injunctions

    17 shares
    Share 7 Tweet 4
  • Trump raises concerns in call with Rep. Max Miller amid abuse allegations

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump picks Katie Zacharia as next White House press secretary

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Not enough quota to unlock this post
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?