The Pentagon said Thursday that it is changing the independent military newspaper Stars and Stripes so it concentrates on “reporting for our warfighters” and no longer includes “woke distractions.”
That message, in a social media post from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s spokesman, is short on specifics and does not mention the news outlet’s legacy of independence from government and military leadership.
It comes a day after The Washington Post reported that applicants for jobs at Stars and Stripes were being asked what they would do to support President Trump’s policies.
Stars and Stripes traces its lineage to the Civil War and has reported news about the military either in its newspaper or online since World War II, largely to an audience of service members stationed overseas. Roughly half its budget comes from the Pentagon and its staff members are considered Defense Department employees.
The outlet’s mission statement emphasizes that it is “editorially independent of interference from outside its own editorial chain-of-command” and that it is unique among news organizations tied to the Defense Department in being “governed by the principles of the First Amendment.”
PhotoQuest / Getty Images 
Congress established that independence in the 1990s after instances of military leadership getting involved in editorial decisions. During Mr. Trump’s first term in 2020, Defense Secretary Mark Esper tried to eliminate government funding for Stars and Stripes – to effectively shut it down – before he was overruled by the president.
Hegseth’s spokesman, Sean Parnell, said on X Thursday that, “We are bringing Stars & Stripes into the 21st century. We will modernize its operations, refocus its content away from woke distractions that syphon morale, and adapt it to serve a new generation of service members.
He said the Pentagon “is returning Stars and Stripes to its original mission: reporting for our warfighters” and will “refocus its content away from woke distractions.”
“Stars and Stripes will be custom tailored to our warfighters,” Parnell wrote. “It will focus on warfighting, weapons systems, fitness, lethality, survivability and ALL THINGS MILITARY. No more repurposed DC gossip columns; no more Associated Press reprints.”
He said the department is committed to ensuring the outlet’s legacy of reporting news that’s important to service members.
Stars and Stripes’ publisher, Max Lederer, did not immediately reply to a message seeking comment. But Jacqueline Smith, the outlet’s ombudsman, called Parnell’s statement a surprise. She said Stars and Stripes reports on matters important to service members and their families – not just weapons systems or war strategy – and she’s detected nothing “woke” about its reporting.
“I think it’s very important that Stars and Stripes maintains its editorial independence, which is the basis of its credibility,” Smith said. A longtime newspaper editor in Connecticut, Smith serves in a role created by Congress three decades ago to ensure that independence, and she reports to the House Armed Services Committee.
It’s the latest move by the Trump administration to impose restrictions on journalists. Most reporters from legacy news outlets have left the Pentagon rather than to agree to new rules imposed by Hegseth that they feel would give him too much control over what they report and write. The New York Times has sued to overturn the regulations.
Mr. Trump has also sought to shut down government-funded outlets like Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty that report independent news about the world in nations overseas.
Also this week, the administration raided the home of a Washington Post journalist as part of an investigation into a contractor accused of stealing government secrets, a move many journalists interpreted as a form of intimidation.
The Post reported that applicants to Stars and Stripes were being asked how they would advance Mr. Trump’s executive orders and policy priorities in the role. They were asked to identify one or two orders or initiatives that were significant to them. That raised questions about whether it was appropriate for a journalist to be given what is, in effect, a loyalty test.
Smith said it was the government’s Office of Personnel Management – not the newspaper – that was responsible for the question on job applications and said it was consistent with what was being asked of applicants for other government jobs.
