• About
  • Contact
Thursday, August 21, 2025
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Hundreds of National Guard forces deployed to L.A. by Trump could be sent to wildfire duty

by Joe Walsh Eleanor Watson
June 30, 2025
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Hundreds of National Guard forces deployed to L.A. by Trump could be sent to wildfire duty

RELATED POSTS

U.S. Navy sailor convicted of selling secrets to China

New York court throws out $527 million penalty in Trump civil fraud case

A military commander has discussed shifting some California National Guard troops away from the Trump administration’s weekslong deployment to deal with protests in Los Angeles so they can help fight wildfires, two U.S. officials told CBS News.

Gen. Gregory Guillot, the leader of U.S. Northern Command, made the request to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, proposing that 200 out of roughly 4,000 California National Guard members be moved from Los Angeles to wildfire duty elsewhere in California. 

The request to shift some troops to wildfire duty was first reported by The Associated Press. 

The purpose of the possible move is to help prepare for wildfire season, one U.S. official said. The other official said they could be placed on standby to respond to wildfires.

Wildfires can happen at any time of year in California, but they usually peak in the summer and fall. The state expects an “early and active season” this year, with above-average activity in July and August, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, or Cal Fire.

The Los Angeles deployment has been controversial and subject to legal challenges. President Trump called up around 4,000 Guard members — and deployed around 700 Marines — over California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s objections, moves Mr. Trump argued were necessary to protect federal buildings and immigration agents from chaotic protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Newsom argued the deployment was illegal and unnecessary.

When Mr. Trump initially called up the California National Guard to deal with protests, the state had warned the move could interfere with its wildfire response. Guard forces often work alongside Cal Fire crews — and as wildfires become more frequent and severe, state officials have said more resources are needed. Newsom’s office said last week the Guard’s firefighting force was only at 40% capacity due to the Los Angeles deployment.

“This deployment comes when California is in the midst of peak wildfire season for both Northern and Southern California and may need to rely on their crucial support,” the state of California wrote in a lawsuit against the Trump administration over the deployment.

A federal district court judge initially sided with the state in its lawsuit, but a panel of appellate court judges paused that ruling, allowing Mr. Trump to maintain control of the Guard.

The troops were shifted to federal service earlier this month under a law known as Title 10, which lets the president call up National Guard forces during a “rebellion” or if “the president is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.” The Trump administration argued those conditions were met due to threats of violence against immigration agents who carried out arrests in the Los Angeles area.

Newsom objected to the move, and the state quickly filed a lawsuit calling it a “power grab.” The state argued that under the law cited by the administration, Mr. Trump does not have the legal authority to call up the Guard without permission from the governor.

A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ultimately sided with the Trump administration, allowing troops to remain in Los Angeles while the state’s lawsuit is heard. The court wrote that Mr. Trump most likely “lawfully exercised his statutory authority” to federalize the Guard, and that the law “does not give governors any veto power.”

More from CBS News

Joe Walsh

Joe Walsh is a senior editor for digital politics at CBS News. Joe previously covered breaking news for Forbes and local news in Boston.

Share6Tweet4Share1

Joe Walsh Eleanor Watson

Related Posts

U.S. Navy sailor convicted of selling secrets to China
Politics

U.S. Navy sailor convicted of selling secrets to China

August 21, 2025
New York court throws out $527 million penalty in Trump civil fraud case
Politics

New York court throws out $527 million penalty in Trump civil fraud case

August 21, 2025
U.S. and EU scramble to strike a trade deal ahead of Aug. 1 deadline
Politics

U.S. and EU flesh out trade commitments under new framework deal

August 21, 2025
Fed Chair Powell faces delicate balancing act in Jackson Hole speech
Politics

Fed Chair Powell faces delicate balancing act in Jackson Hole speech

August 21, 2025
California Supreme Court declines to stop Newsom’s redistricting plan
Politics

California Supreme Court declines to stop Newsom’s redistricting plan

August 20, 2025
Trump admin. can end deportation protections for Honduras, Nepal and Nicaragua
Politics

Trump admin. can end deportation protections for Honduras, Nepal and Nicaragua

August 20, 2025
Next Post
Colin Allred will run for Texas Senate seat

Colin Allred will run for Texas Senate seat

Trump threatens Musk subsidies after Musk again targets Trump’s budget bill

Trump threatens Musk subsidies after Musk again targets Trump's budget bill

Recommended Stories

Former Atty. General Eric Holder talks with House Democrats about redistricting

Former Atty. General Eric Holder talks with House Democrats about redistricting

August 13, 2025
GOP Sen. Josh Hawley, Democrats vote to advance congressional stock trading ban

GOP Sen. Josh Hawley, Democrats vote to advance congressional stock trading ban

July 30, 2025
Court limits Trump’s asylum crackdown at the U.S.-Mexico border

Court limits Trump’s asylum crackdown at the U.S.-Mexico border

August 2, 2025

Popular Stories

  • Democrats unveil maps of California’s redistricting proposal

    Democrats unveil maps of California’s redistricting proposal

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Kayla AK: Sacramento’s Rising Voice in Rap and Influence

    16 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump creates task force for 2028 Los Angeles Olympics

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Plane in fatal Alaska crash had too much moose meat, dragged antlers, NTSB says

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Wholesale food prices skyrocket 11% in April

    18 shares
    Share 7 Tweet 5
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?