• About
  • Contact
Tuesday, November 18, 2025
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Appeals court upholds decision against Trump’s view on birthright citizenship

by Kathryn Watson
October 3, 2025
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Appeals court upholds decision against Trump’s view on birthright citizenship

RELATED POSTS

Why this GOP congressman voted against releasing the Epstein files

Trump says MBS “knew nothing” about journalist Jamal Khashoggi’s killing

Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday became the latest court to determine the Trump administration’s effort to end birthright citizenship is likely unconstitutional. 

In a 100-page ruling, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a Boston district court’s injunction that blocked the government from enforcing an executive order signed by President Trump to significantly narrow birthright citizenship, the concept that people born in the U.S. are automatically citizens, regardless of their parents’ immigration status. The appeals court ruled in favor of plaintiff states and against the Trump administration. 

Other cases challenging the president’s effort to restrict birthright citizenship have been making their way through the courts, and they haven’t been decided in the president’s favor.  

“Our nation’s history of efforts to restrict birthright citizenship — from Dred Scott in the decade before the Civil War to the attempted justification for the enforcement of the Chinese Exclusion Act in Wong Kim Ark — has not been a proud one,” the court’s chief justice wrote. “Indeed, those efforts each have been rejected, once by the people through constitutional amendment in 1868 and once by the court relying on the same amendment three decades later, and at a time when tensions over immigration were also high.”

“The ‘lessons of history’ thus give us every reason to be wary of now blessing this most recent effort to break with our established tradition of recognizing birthright citizenship and to make citizenship depend on the actions of one’s parents rather than — in all but the rarest of circumstances — the simple fact of being born in the United States,” the appeals court concluded. 

CBS News has reached out to the White House for comment on the ruling.

In Mr. Trump’s first week in office, he signed an executive order that sought to end birthright citizenship for the children of undocumented immigrants or temporary visa holders. The 14th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1868, has long been interpreted to automatically grant citizenship to virtually everybody born on U.S. soil, even if their parents are in the country illegally or temporarily. Federal judges in several states have blocked the order from taking effect.

The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to review the constitutionality of Mr. Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order in two different cases, one brought by four states and another by parents whose children would be impacted by the policy.

The birthright citizenship issue reached the high court earlier this year, but the justices did not rule on the merits, instead curtailing lower court judges’ power to issue nationwide injunctions blocking Mr. Trump’s executive order.

Melissa Quinn

contributed to this report.

More from CBS News

Kathryn Watson

Kathryn Watson is a politics reporter for CBS News Digital, based in Washington, D.C.

Share6Tweet4Share1

Kathryn Watson

Related Posts

Why this GOP congressman voted against releasing the Epstein files
Politics

Why this GOP congressman voted against releasing the Epstein files

November 18, 2025
Trump says MBS “knew nothing” about journalist Jamal Khashoggi’s killing
Politics

Trump says MBS “knew nothing” about journalist Jamal Khashoggi’s killing

November 18, 2025
Epstein accusers speak ahead of House vote: “This is one demand we all share”
Politics

Epstein accusers speak ahead of House vote: “This is one demand we all share”

November 18, 2025
House vote on Epstein files expected today after Trump offers support
Politics

House vote on Epstein files expected today after Trump offers support

November 18, 2025
Feds expanding N.C. immigration enforcement actions to Raleigh, mayor says
Politics

Feds expanding N.C. immigration enforcement actions to Raleigh, mayor says

November 18, 2025
Trump has elaborate welcome planned for Saudi crown prince’s White House visit
Politics

Trump has elaborate welcome planned for Saudi crown prince’s White House visit

November 18, 2025
Next Post
Netanyahu ordered drone attacks on Gaza-bound humanitarian boats, sources say

Netanyahu ordered drone attacks on Gaza-bound humanitarian boats, sources say

8-year sentence for plot to kill Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh

8-year sentence for plot to kill Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh

Recommended Stories

Trump admin. aims to auction offshore oil leases despite states’ opposition

Trump admin. aims to auction offshore oil leases despite states’ opposition

October 24, 2025
U.S. warship docks in Trinidad and Tobago amid tensions with Venezuela

U.S. warship docks in Trinidad and Tobago amid tensions with Venezuela

October 26, 2025
Trump hikes tariffs on Canada by another 10% in response to anti-tariff ad

Trump hikes tariffs on Canada by another 10% in response to anti-tariff ad

October 25, 2025

Popular Stories

  • University of Virginia president to resign amid Trump administration investigation

    University of Virginia president to resign amid Trump administration investigation

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • GOP “big, beautiful bill” would force USPS to sell its new EV mail trucks

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Court battles across U.S. escalate over Trump’s immigration raids

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump says Coke agrees to switch formula back to cane sugar, like in Mexico

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Texas overhauls anti-abortion program that spent millions with little oversight

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?