• About
  • Contact
Tuesday, June 23, 2026
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Virginia Giuffre’s family criticizes DOJ in handling of Epstein files

by Kelsie Hoffman
February 3, 2026
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Virginia Giuffre’s family criticizes DOJ in handling of Epstein files

RELATED POSTS

Iran war update: Vance puts positive spin on talks, but widespread skepticism remains

Trump says proof that vandals cut Reflecting Pool will be provided in court

The family of Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein‘s most vocal accusers who died by suicide in 2025, says they are outraged over the Justice Department’s handling of the latest release of the Epstein files.

Sky and Amanda Roberts, Giuffre’s brother and sister-in-law, say the department failed to protect survivors of Epstein’s abuse when releasing the documents.

“I mean these are intimate details in these documents that their family members are going to see, their kids are going to see, and to unredact their names is incredibly insensitive and retraumatizing,” Sky Roberts, Giuffre’s brother, said in an interview with “CBS Mornings” on Tuesday.

He said he thinks the Justice Department is putting women at risk who didn’t want their names publicized.

“They’re redacting the names of perpetrators and they’re unredacting the names of victims, quite the opposite of what the Epstein Files Transparency Act was meant to do,” he said.

Attorneys for some of the victims have said the latest release contained the unredacted images and identities of multiple survivors. And on Monday, the Justice Department said it withdrew several thousand documents and “media” related to Epstein after lawyers told a New York judge nearly 100 victims’ lives were “turned upside down” due to sloppy redactions in the latest files release, The Associated Press reported.

A spokesperson for the Department of Justice told CBS News the DOJ “takes victim protection very seriously and has redacted thousands of victim names in the millions of published pages to protect the innocent.” The department also said that as soon as a victim raises concerns about a document, the file is removed from its site so officials can decide if further redactions are needed.

The Epstein Files Transparency Act required the DOJ to release all files related to Epstein and his co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell by Dec. 19. Due to the volume of documents, the department said they would be released on a rolling basis.

The latest release last week included 3 million documents and photos, and a slew of notable figures were mentioned or pictured in the files. 

A DOJ official said on Sunday that the review process is finished despite releasing only about half of the more than 6 million files.

In its review, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said the recent files don’t “allow us necessarily to prosecute.”

“I would say my reaction to that is that you have victims, you have survivors, my sister included, that have given depositions after depositions. They’ve given their own testimony under oath to our own Congress … and so we would ask the same of the men that were potentially named in these,” Sky Roberts said.

“We want more answers”

After the latest Epstein files release, 20 survivors and family members – including Sky and Amanda Roberts – said in a statement that “the public still does not have the full truth about who enabled him, who participated in his exploitation and who has been shielded for years.”

“I think it’s selective, too,” Amanda Roberts said about the process. “So if you go through a lot of these documents, there are points where their names are redacted, but then there are some files that have potentially slipped through.”

The Roberts said they plan to continue to fight for justice and will attend a House Judiciary Committee hearing next week where Attorney General Pam Bondi is expected to testify.

“I think the first question to ask Pam Bondi is … why should you not be held in contempt? There’s one very big piece of the Department of Justice that’s missing here and it is that keyword justice,” Sky Roberts said. 

“I think it is about time that we subpoena and we start fully investigating this,” he said.

He added, “we want more answers from her” and many members of the Justice Department.

In:

Share6Tweet4Share1

Kelsie Hoffman

Related Posts

Iran war update: Vance puts positive spin on talks, but widespread skepticism remains
Politics

Iran war update: Vance puts positive spin on talks, but widespread skepticism remains

June 22, 2026
Trump says proof that vandals cut Reflecting Pool will be provided in court
Politics

Trump says proof that vandals cut Reflecting Pool will be provided in court

June 22, 2026
Trump plan would increase citizenship application fee by $570
Politics

Trump plan would increase citizenship application fee by $570

June 22, 2026
Bipartisan housing bill aims to boost homeownership. Could it work?
Politics

Bipartisan housing bill aims to boost homeownership. Could it work?

June 22, 2026
Judge quashes 6 grand jury subpoenas against Minnesota officials
Politics

Judge quashes 6 grand jury subpoenas against Minnesota officials

June 22, 2026
Judge blocks Trump administration’s database of Americans’ personal info
Politics

Judge blocks Trump administration’s database of Americans’ personal info

June 22, 2026
Next Post
House committee report accuses DHS of Good, Pretti killings cover-up

House committee report accuses DHS of Good, Pretti killings cover-up

Watchdog shares whistleblower complaint involving Gabbard with Congress after delay

Watchdog shares whistleblower complaint involving Gabbard with Congress after delay

Recommended Stories

States not required to give community-based care for those with disabilities: DOJ opinion

States not required to give community-based care for those with disabilities: DOJ opinion

June 18, 2026
DOJ rebuffs judge’s demand to state “anti-weaponization” fund is dead

DOJ rebuffs judge’s demand to state “anti-weaponization” fund is dead

June 19, 2026
U.S. strike on alleged drug boat kills 2, leaves 6 survivors

U.S. strike on alleged drug boat kills 2, leaves 6 survivors

June 21, 2026

Popular Stories

  • California’s construction industry hurt by ICE raids, builder says

    California’s construction industry hurt by ICE raids, builder says

    46 shares
    Share 18 Tweet 12
  • Trump decrees any attack on Qatar be treated as threat to U.S.

    22 shares
    Share 9 Tweet 6
  • Judge won’t block DOJ from releasing Biden conversations with biographer

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • What’s missing from the Epstein files?

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • New federal Medicaid rules require 1 month of work. Some states demand more.

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Not enough quota to unlock this post
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?