• About
  • Contact
Sunday, May 3, 2026
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Federal judge denies Minnesota’s request to temporarily halt Operation Metro Surge

by Chloe Rosen
January 31, 2026
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Federal judge denies Minnesota’s request to temporarily halt Operation Metro Surge

RELATED POSTS

States scramble to redistrict after Supreme Court limits Voting Rights Act

Trump says U.S. Navy is “sort of like pirates” in Strait of Hormuz

Federal judge Kate Menendez denied Minnesota’s motion for a temporary restraining order to halt “Operation Metro Surge” on Saturday. The court documents, filed on Saturday, say that Minnesota and its cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul have not met their burden of proof.   

The argument to halt operations, in part, stated that the federal operation is “causing harm to the Twin Cities and State themselves, as well as their residents.” Lawyers with the U.S. Department of Justice have called the lawsuit “legally frivolous.”

In the court documents, Menendez cited another recent case where the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals recently vacated the preliminary injunction ruling that restricted the force federal agents can use on peaceful protesters, saying that court case had “much more settled precedent” in that case and that “the Court of Appeals determined that the injunction would cause irreparable harm to the government because it would hamper their efforts to enforce federal law.” Menendez also wrote, “If that injunction went too far, then halting the entire operation certainly would.”

“Because there is evidence supporting both sides’ arguments as to motivation and the relative merits of each side’s competing positions are unclear, the Court is reluctant to find that the likelihood-of-success factor weighs sufficiently in favor of granting a preliminary injunction,” the judge said in the ruling.

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey released a statement after Menendez’s ruling that stated in part: 

“Of course, we’re disappointed. This decision doesn’t change what people here have lived through — fear, disruption, and harm caused by a federal operation that never belonged in Minneapolis in the first place. This operation has not brought public safety. It’s brought the opposite and has detracted from the order we need for a working city. It’s an invasion, and it needs to stop.” 

The state of Minnesota and the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul have sought a temporary restraining order in their lawsuit against Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and other Trump administration officials.

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi took to social media Saturday to laud the ruling, calling it “another HUGE” legal win for the Justice Department on X.

Minnesota’s argument

The state filed the lawsuit claiming the Trump administration has “violated the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,” through infringement of police power and unlawful coercion. Minnesota alleges it “has been singled out and targeted by ICE in a way that no other state has experienced.” 

In the court filing, Minnesota argues that the operation is not motivated by “a legitimate law-enforcement purpose” but rather serves as a “pretext for leveraging demands and punishing political leaders within the State and Twin Cities who oppose the Trump administration’s immigration policies.” 

The state also claims that one of the Trump administration’s true objectives is gaining access to Minnesota’s voter rolls. 

Court documents also state that the large-scale presence of federal agents has disrupted the healthcare industry, affected local businesses and stopped residents from going to religious services. The state also claims that “federal officers’ use of force and being detained on their way to and from school had had ‘negative impacts on attendance and student focus'” forcing several school districts to temporarily close. 

Trump administration’s argument

The Trump administration argues Operation Metro Surge was launched “to address the dangers arising from the presence of illegal aliens in the Twin Cities.” The administration also argues the dangers are exacerbated by Minnesota, Minneapolis and St. Paul’s sanctuary city policies. 

The Department of Justice filed a 34-page lawsuit in 2025 alleging “Minnesota officials are jeopardizing the safety of their own citizens by allowing illegal aliens to circumvent the legal process.” 

The Trump administration also claims that Operation Metro Surge has “strictly been in furtherance of “the enforcement of federal law,” in line with President Trump’s campaign promises.”

Operation Metro Surge is the largest federal deployment of law enforcement in United States history.   

In:

Share6Tweet4Share1

Chloe Rosen

Related Posts

States scramble to redistrict after Supreme Court limits Voting Rights Act
Politics

States scramble to redistrict after Supreme Court limits Voting Rights Act

May 2, 2026
Trump says U.S. Navy is “sort of like pirates” in Strait of Hormuz
Politics

Trump says U.S. Navy is “sort of like pirates” in Strait of Hormuz

May 2, 2026
Rising oil prices cause political headache for Trump administration
Politics

Rising oil prices cause political headache for Trump administration

May 2, 2026
No more runway for Spirit Airlines as budget carrier shuts down
Politics

No more runway for Spirit Airlines as budget carrier shuts down

May 2, 2026
5/2: Saturday Morning
Politics

5/2: Saturday Morning

May 2, 2026
Cuba plans to open up to investment from nationals in U.S. amid pressure from Trump
Politics

Trump tightens U.S. sanctions on Cuba, signaling a warning to the island, expert says

May 1, 2026
Next Post
Proposed Venezuelan bill could lead to release of hundreds of political prisoners

Proposed Venezuelan bill could lead to release of hundreds of political prisoners

Explosion in Iranian port city ahead of Iran’s naval drill in the Strait of Hormuz

Explosion in Iranian port city ahead of Iran's naval drill in the Strait of Hormuz

Recommended Stories

4/20: The Takeout with Major Garrett

4/20: The Takeout with Major Garrett

April 20, 2026
White House says Vance will lead more talks with Iran

White House says Vance will lead more talks with Iran

April 19, 2026
Arizona sues to block proposed ICE detention facility near site with chemicals

Arizona sues to block proposed ICE detention facility near site with chemicals

April 25, 2026

Popular Stories

  • Talks to bail out Spirit Airlines stall as company teeters toward collapse

    Talks to bail out Spirit Airlines stall as company teeters toward collapse

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Federal judge denies Minnesota’s request to temporarily halt Operation Metro Surge

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump on DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s Iran assessment: “She’s wrong”

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • 5/2: Saturday Morning

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump administration to cut 5,000 U.S. troops from Germany

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?