• About
  • Contact
Saturday, March 7, 2026
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Judge bars Lindsey Halligan’s continued use of U.S. attorney title

by Jacob Rosen
January 20, 2026
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0
Judge bars Lindsey Halligan’s continued use of U.S. attorney title

A federal judge barred Lindsey Halligan from referring to herself as U.S. attorney in court filings, finding that her continued use of the title “ignores a binding court order” that disqualified her from the position last year.  

In an 18-page ruling Tuesday, U.S. District Judge David Novak, who sits on the federal bench in Richmond, Virginia, ruled that Halligan’s “continued identification of herself as the United States Attorney for this District ignores a binding court order and may not continue,” and ruled that Halligan could face disciplinary proceedings if she continues to use that “improper moniker.”

RELATED POSTS

GOP Rep. Darrell Issa says he will retire, months after declaring he’s “not quitting”

DOJ asks appeals court to restore Trump’s executive orders targeting law firms

Novak’s ruling comes after a November ruling from U.S. District Judge Cameron Currie found that Halligan’s appointment as interim U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia was invalid and violated the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. She dismissed the cases Halligan had brought against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. The Justice Department has appealed the ruling. 

The statute invoked by the Trump administration to appoint Halligan allows an interim U.S. attorney to serve for 120 days. After that, the interim U.S. attorney may be extended by the U.S. district court judges for the region. 

Earlier this month, Novak ordered Halligan to provide the basis for her repeated use of the title of U.S. attorney and explain why it “does not constitute a false or misleading statement,” after she listed herself on an indictment returned in the district in December as a “United States attorney and special attorney.”

Top Justice Department officials defended Halligan’s attempts to remain in her position as a U.S. attorney in court filings, accusing the Trump-appointed judge of “gross abuse of power” and attempting to “coerce the Executive Branch into conformity.”

The filing, signed by Halligan, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, called Novak’s move an “inquisition,” “insult,” and a “cudgel” against the executive branch. The Justice Department argued that Currie’s ruling in November applied only to the Comey and James cases and did not bar Halligan from calling herself U.S. attorney in other cases that she oversees. 

However, the Justice Department later Tuesday reversed course, telling prosecutors to stop referring to Halligan as U.S. attorney and to refer to her instead as special attorney going forward, according to a source familiar with the matter. CBS News has reached out to the Justice Department.

In his ruling, Novak wrote that the Justice Department’s argument “rings hollow,” and “fundamentally misunderstands” the legal issue at question.

“Judge Currie, speaking for all district judges in this District, found Ms. Halligan’s appointment as Interim United States Attorney unlawful and issued two orders dismissing indictments, both of which were premised directly on that rationale,” Novak wrote. “Those Orders, though currently on appeal, have not been overturned or stayed, and thus constitute the law of this District. Having been found by this Court to be unlawfully appointed, Ms. Halligan lacks lawful authority to represent herself as the United States Attorney before this Court.”

Novak also criticized the quality of the Justice Department’s response to his order, stating that it had “unnecessary rhetoric” that “contains a level of vitriol more appropriate for a cable news talk show and falls far beneath the level of advocacy expected from litigants in this Court, particularly the Department of Justice.”

Instead of working through “numerous legal options” that would have allowed her to identify herself as U.S. attorney while the appeal of Currie’s ruling continues, “she elected to simply ignore valid court orders.”

“The Court finds it inconceivable that the Department of Justice, which holds a duty to faithfully execute the laws of the United States even those with which it may have disagreement, would repeatedly ignore court orders, while simultaneously prosecuting citizens for breaking the law,” Novak wrote. “If the Court were to allow Ms. Halligan and the Department of Justice to pick and choose which orders that they will follow, the same would have to be true for other litigants and our system of justice would crumble.”

Halligan is a former insurance lawyer who was a member of President Trump’s legal team and joined Mr. Trump’s White House staff after he won a second term in 2024. In September, Halligan was selected to serve as interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia after her predecessor abruptly left the post amid concerns he would be forced out for failing to prosecute James.

She was appointed to her post on Sept. 22 for a total of 120 days, which Novak said expired Tuesday. While Halligan has been nominated by the White House, neither of Virginia’s Democratic senators has signed on to advance the nomination for a vote in the Senate.

Days after she was appointed, Halligan sought and secured a two-count indictment against Comey alleging he lied to Congress during testimony in September 2020. James, the New York attorney general, was indicted on bank fraud charges in early October. Both pleaded not guilty and pursued several arguments to have their respective indictments dismissed, including the validity of Halligan’s appointment and claims of vindictive prosecution.

“The Court recognizes that Ms. Halligan lacks the prosecutorial experience that has long been the norm for those nominated to the position of United States Attorney in this District,” Novak wrote. “Consequently, and in light of her inexperience, the Court grants Ms. Halligan the benefit of the doubt and refrains from referring her for further investigation and disciplinary action regarding her misrepresentations to this Court at this time.”

Also on Tuesday, the chief federal judge in the Eastern District of Virginia posted that the court is seeking applicants to replace Halligan. Federal law says that judges in a district without a Senate-confirmed U.S. attorney are tasked with selecting a replacement, although President Trump could fire whomever the court chooses to succeed Halligan. 

More from CBS News

Go deeper with The Free Press


Share6Tweet4Share1

Jacob Rosen

Related Posts

GOP Rep. Darrell Issa says he will retire, months after declaring he’s “not quitting”
Politics

GOP Rep. Darrell Issa says he will retire, months after declaring he’s “not quitting”

March 6, 2026
Key legislators seek DOJ records on Alex Pretti and Renee Good killings by next week
Politics

DOJ asks appeals court to restore Trump’s executive orders targeting law firms

March 6, 2026
Man convicted in plot to assassinate Trump that was tied to Iran’s paramilitary
Politics

Man convicted in plot to assassinate Trump that was tied to Iran’s paramilitary

March 6, 2026
Mom whose son was killed by ICE doesn’t blame Trump, but calls for change
Politics

Bodycam video contradicts ICE claims in fatal shooting of Ruben Ray Martinez

March 6, 2026
Russia providing intel to Iran about U.S. positions, sources say
Politics

Russia providing intel to Iran about U.S. positions, sources say

March 6, 2026
Virginia passes legislation banning schools from teaching falsehoods about Jan. 6
Politics

Virginia passes legislation banning schools from teaching falsehoods about Jan. 6

March 6, 2026
Next Post
Lawmakers intensify efforts to remove Trump’s name from Kennedy Center

Lawmakers intensify efforts to remove Trump's name from Kennedy Center

Trump to address Davos as allies push back against his bid for Greenland

Trump to address Davos as allies push back against his bid for Greenland

Recommended Stories

Judge blocks California law banning federal law enforcement agents from wearing masks

Judge blocks California law banning federal law enforcement agents from wearing masks

February 9, 2026
Texts show Rep. Gonzales sent explicit messages to staffer who later died by suicide

Rep. Tony Gonzales admits to affair with former staffer, calling it a “mistake”

March 5, 2026
Trump throws support behind Nexstar-Tegna broadcast deal he once opposed

Trump throws support behind Nexstar-Tegna broadcast deal he once opposed

February 7, 2026

Popular Stories

  • Man charged with shining laser pointer at Marine One with Trump aboard

    Man charged with shining laser pointer at Marine One with Trump aboard

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Texas man arrested for allegedly making bomb threats outside ICE facility

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Senate committee to vote on Emil Bove’s nomination as federal judge

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Critics of Trump’s presidential library fundraising say “there are no rules”

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Judge says DHS can’t end protected status for Haitian migrants this year

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?