• About
  • Contact
Thursday, April 16, 2026
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Texas appeals to Supreme Court after federal judges block newly drawn Congressional maps

by Jack Fink
November 18, 2025
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0
Texas appeals to Supreme Court after federal judges block newly drawn Congressional maps

RELATED POSTS

Gabbard sends criminal referrals to DOJ for 2 officials linked to Trump impeachment

4/15: The Takeout with Major Garrett

Hours after federal judges blocked Texas from using a newly drawn Congressional map, state leaders filed an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court. 

The redrawn map sparked a nationwide redistricting battle and is part of President Trump’s efforts to preserve a Republican majority in next year’s midterm elections. 

The ruling by three federal judges served as a blow to Republicans while Democrats celebrated it. That’s because under the newly drawn maps approved by Republicans, who stood to gain five new seats in Texas, the Democrats were facing a game of political musical chairs — some were set to retire or primary each other. Now, that doesn’t have to happen.  

“Substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 map”, which is illegal, the two federal judges said in the ruling.

They also cited a U.S. Department of Justice letter to Gov. Greg Abbott from July about four coalition districts made up of Blacks and Latinos, which include the 33rd Congressional District in North Texas, represented by Democrat Marc Veasey. 

“DOJ threatened legal action if Texas didn’t immediately dismantle and redraw these districts, a threat based on their racial makeup. Notably, the DOJ letter targeted only majority non-white districts,” the judges’ ruling said. “Any mention of majority white districts, which DOJ presumably would have also targeted if its aims were partisan rather than racial, was conspicuously absent.” 

While the judges temporarily blocked the new maps, there will still be a trial on them eventually.

Abbott slams judge’s “erroneous” decision

In a statement Tuesday, Abbott slammed the judges’ decision, calling it “Clearly erroneous and undermines the authority the U.S. Constitution assigns to the Texas Legislature by imposing a different map by judicial edict. The State of Texas will swiftly appeal to the United States Supreme Court.” 

The state filed its appeal to the highest court late Tuesday afternoon. 

CBS News Texas spoke with Democratic members of Congress from North Texas who praised the ruling. 

“I totally agree with the court,” said Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Farmers Branch. “You know, what the Republicans and Greg Abbott did in Texas, to seeking to disenfranchise voters of color was egregious, and the court clearly agreed with that. This opinion is sharp, and it is clear, and it is concise.” 

Rep. Marc Veasey, D-Fort Worth, said, “I feel like we’re on good legal grounds here. So, I feel confident, but you know I’m going to be again cautiously optimistic in watching what the Supreme Court says.” 

“I’ve always made it clear that this was racial, and I know that some people want to run away from the race element, but the law protects it. We know that our Constitution recognizes and protects it,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas.

Texas Republicans call judge’s decision wrong

CBS News Texas also spoke with Republicans Tuesday night who called the judges’ decision wrong and said they are putting their faith in the U.S. Supreme Court. 

Aaron Reitz, R-Candidate for Texas Attorney General, said, “My view is similar to Gov. Abbott’s and Attorney General Paxton, who have criticized the decision because, in fact, race was not used to draw these lines. Only politics was used, which is the appropriate standard.” 

Another candidate for Attorney General, State Senator Mayes Middleton, R-Galveston, said it was a partisan map. 

“Quite simply, this is a partisan map that draws more Republican seats and that’s why we’re going to win,” said Middleton. “That is why we’re going to be victorious in this appeal before the Supreme Court.” 

Aside from the two judges who ruled, there is another judge on that panel, and he disagreed with the other two. We are waiting to see what his dissent says. 

As a result of the ruling, Congresswoman Johnson and Congressman Veasey said they will run for re-election in their existing Congressional districts that they represent now. 

As for Congresswoman Crockett, she said she still hasn’t decided whether to run for re-election in her Congressional District in Dallas or if she is going to run statewide for U.S. Senate. She said she is waiting for the polling to come back and that she hopes to make a decision by Thanksgiving. 

The key, Crockett said, is if the polling shows she can beat a Republican candidate in the general election next November. 

“At the end of the day, if the numbers are strong that I am our best shot, then it’s bigger than my district, it’s bigger than the state of Texas,” said Crockett. “This is about the country because we know if we can change the Senate map in this country, then that’s where we start to get wins.” 

Crockett said the only way she or another Democrat can win is if they attract new voters, people who haven’t gone to the polls before, and not by Republicans simply crossing the political aisle.

Watch Eye On Politics at 7:30 Sunday morning on CBS News Texas on air and streaming

More from CBS News

Share6Tweet4Share1

Jack Fink

Related Posts

Gabbard sends criminal referrals to DOJ for 2 officials linked to Trump impeachment
Politics

Gabbard sends criminal referrals to DOJ for 2 officials linked to Trump impeachment

April 15, 2026
4/15: The Takeout with Major Garrett
Politics

4/15: The Takeout with Major Garrett

April 15, 2026
Billionaires, dark money fuel questions ahead of 2026 midterms
Politics

Billionaires, dark money fuel questions ahead of 2026 midterms

April 15, 2026
Senate rejects 4th attempt to curb Trump’s war powers in Iran
Politics

Senate rejects 4th attempt to curb Trump’s war powers in Iran

April 15, 2026
Why Jerome Powell — not Trump — will decide when the Fed chief steps down
Politics

Why Jerome Powell — not Trump — will decide when the Fed chief steps down

April 15, 2026
House Democrats file articles of impeachment against Hegseth
Politics

House Democrats file articles of impeachment against Hegseth

April 15, 2026
Next Post
Comey to challenge his indictment for “vindictive and selective” prosecution

Comey to challenge his indictment for "vindictive and selective" prosecution

Larry Summers resigns from OpenAI board after Epstein emails released

Larry Summers resigns from OpenAI board after Epstein emails released

Recommended Stories

Latest on Iran war as Trump announces Strait of Hormuz blockade

Latest on Iran war as Trump announces Strait of Hormuz blockade

April 12, 2026
DOJ seeks to drop case against ex-police officers charged in Breonna Taylor’s death

DOJ seeks to drop case against ex-police officers charged in Breonna Taylor’s death

March 20, 2026
Listen Live: Supreme Court hears birthright citizenship case, with Trump attending

Listen Live: Supreme Court hears birthright citizenship case, with Trump attending

April 1, 2026

Popular Stories

  • French President Emmanuel Macron sues right-wing podcaster Candace Owens

    French President Emmanuel Macron sues right-wing podcaster Candace Owens

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Alex Jones asks Supreme Court to halt $1.5 billion defamation judgment

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump’s strikes on Iran set back nuclear program by months, initial intel assessment finds

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Alcohol death toll is growing, US government reports say

    17 shares
    Share 7 Tweet 4
  • Robinhood’s Revenue Fell More Than Expected at Year’s Start

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?