• About
  • Contact
Thursday, October 2, 2025
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Judge rules Trump admin. can’t require states to cooperate with ICE to get FEMA grants

by Joe Walsh
September 24, 2025
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Judge rules Trump admin. can’t require states to cooperate with ICE to get FEMA grants

RELATED POSTS

DHS and FBI warn about attacks on ICE facilities by “domestic violent extremists”

Trump threatens permanent cuts as shutdown stalemate continues

A federal judge ruled Wednesday it is unconstitutional for the Trump administration to require states to cooperate with immigration enforcement in order to get some Federal Emergency Management Agency grants — a legal setback in the administration’s push to revoke funding to “sanctuary” cities and states. 

U.S. District Judge William Smith of Rhode Island ruled in favor of 20 mostly Democratic states that had sued FEMA, accusing the administration of “holding critical emergency preparedness and response funding hostage” unless they assist immigration agents. 

The decision is likely to be appealed.

The states that sued — which include California, New York and Illinois — took issue with a Department of Homeland Security document issued earlier this year that says recipients of DHS grants must “honor requests for cooperation” with immigration authorities, including requests to detain migrants or share information. Some of the plaintiffs are “sanctuary” states that have laws restricting cooperation between police and immigration agents.

The states argued this move violates federal law and the Constitution, and could deprive them of billions per year in key disaster grants from FEMA, which is a sub-agency of DHS.

The Trump administration has argued its policy doesn’t violate the law. Also, months after the lawsuit was filed, the government told the court it had decided most of the FEMA disaster grants that the states were concerned about losing will not be tied to immigration cooperation after all. The administration called the lawsuit moot on those grounds. 

The states called the Trump administration’s decision not to link disaster grants to immigration enforcement “halfhearted and incomplete,” arguing it’s unclear if the decision was communicated to agency staff or if it will apply to years beyond 2025.

In a 45-page ruling Wednesday, Smith sided with the states and granted summary judgment, calling the policy “both arbitrary and capricious and unconstitutional.”

“Plaintiff States stand to suffer irreparable harm; the effect of the loss of emergency and disaster funds cannot be recovered later, and the downstream effect on disaster response and public safety are real and not compensable,” Smith wrote.

New York Attorney General Letitia James hailed the ruling in a statement, writing: “The federal government cannot prioritize its cruel immigration agenda over Americans’ safety. Today, the court affirmed that it is blatantly unconstitutional for DHS to hold life-saving disaster relief funds hostage to advance its anti-immigration efforts.”

DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin asserted in a statement that cities and states that “break the law and prevent us from arresting criminal illegal aliens should not receive federal funding.”

“The Trump Administration is committed to restoring the rule of law. No lawsuit, not this one or any other, is going to stop us from doing that,” she wrote.

The ruling follows a monthslong gambit by President Trump to punish “sanctuary” cities and states that limit cooperation between the police and Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

The Trump administration argues that those jurisdictions make it harder for ICE to apprehend undocumented immigrants, including accused criminals and people who are in state or local custody. But “sanctuary” cities and states typically argue that requiring them to cooperate with ICE would undermine trust in local police and make some immigrants wary of reporting crimes.

Within hours of returning to office in January, Mr. Trump signed an executive order telling federal agencies to ensure that “sanctuary” jurisdictions “do not receive access to Federal funds.” Since then, several agencies have moved to restrict grants to “sanctuary” cities and states, including the Department of Justice and the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Those moves have drawn lawsuits from Democratic cities and states. Last month, a San Francisco-based judge blocked the Trump administration from cutting off funding to almost three dozen cities and counties, including Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco and Boston.

More from CBS News

Joe Walsh

Joe Walsh is a senior editor for digital politics at CBS News. Joe previously covered breaking news for Forbes and local news in Boston.

Share6Tweet4Share1

Joe Walsh

Related Posts

U.S. sends deportees convicted of violent crimes to small African country of Eswatini
Politics

DHS and FBI warn about attacks on ICE facilities by “domestic violent extremists”

October 2, 2025
Trump threatens permanent cuts as shutdown stalemate continues
Politics

Trump threatens permanent cuts as shutdown stalemate continues

October 2, 2025
White House asks 9 universities to sign agreement to guarantee funding
Politics

White House asks 9 universities to sign agreement to guarantee funding

October 2, 2025
CBS News poll finds negativity on economy, job market, concerns about AI impact
Politics

CBS News poll finds negativity on economy, job market, concerns about AI impact

October 2, 2025
Kilmar Abrego Garcia to seek asylum in U.S.
Politics

Immigration judge denies Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s bid to reopen immigration case

October 2, 2025
Government shutdown enters second day with no signs of a deal
Politics

How much could a government shutdown cost the economy and taxpayers?

October 2, 2025
Next Post
Federal prosecutors near decision on whether to charge James Comey, sources say

Federal prosecutors near decision on whether to charge James Comey, sources say

White House tells agencies to prepare for layoffs if government shuts down

White House tells agencies to prepare for layoffs if government shuts down

Recommended Stories

White House requests emergency funds to protect government officials

White House requests emergency funds to protect government officials

September 14, 2025
Here’s how Trump’s proposed Gaza peace plan would work

Here’s how Trump’s proposed Gaza peace plan would work

September 29, 2025
Judge won’t reinstate eight government watchdogs fired by Trump

Judge won’t reinstate eight government watchdogs fired by Trump

September 24, 2025

Popular Stories

  • Senate returns as lawmakers stare down government shutdown

    Senate returns as lawmakers stare down government shutdown

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • DHS and FBI warn about attacks on ICE facilities by “domestic violent extremists”

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • How much could a government shutdown cost the economy and taxpayers?

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Judge blocks feds from cutting millions in NYC transit anti-terrorism funds

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump administration freezes $18 billion in infrastructure funding to New York

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?