• About
  • Contact
Saturday, March 21, 2026
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Judge rules Trump admin. can’t require states to cooperate with ICE to get FEMA grants

by Joe Walsh
September 24, 2025
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Judge rules Trump admin. can’t require states to cooperate with ICE to get FEMA grants

RELATED POSTS

Senate blocks voting bill’s amendment on trans athletes during weekend session

Airport delays worsen as Congress fails to pass DHS funding bill

A federal judge ruled Wednesday it is unconstitutional for the Trump administration to require states to cooperate with immigration enforcement in order to get some Federal Emergency Management Agency grants — a legal setback in the administration’s push to revoke funding to “sanctuary” cities and states. 

U.S. District Judge William Smith of Rhode Island ruled in favor of 20 mostly Democratic states that had sued FEMA, accusing the administration of “holding critical emergency preparedness and response funding hostage” unless they assist immigration agents. 

The decision is likely to be appealed.

The states that sued — which include California, New York and Illinois — took issue with a Department of Homeland Security document issued earlier this year that says recipients of DHS grants must “honor requests for cooperation” with immigration authorities, including requests to detain migrants or share information. Some of the plaintiffs are “sanctuary” states that have laws restricting cooperation between police and immigration agents.

The states argued this move violates federal law and the Constitution, and could deprive them of billions per year in key disaster grants from FEMA, which is a sub-agency of DHS.

The Trump administration has argued its policy doesn’t violate the law. Also, months after the lawsuit was filed, the government told the court it had decided most of the FEMA disaster grants that the states were concerned about losing will not be tied to immigration cooperation after all. The administration called the lawsuit moot on those grounds. 

The states called the Trump administration’s decision not to link disaster grants to immigration enforcement “halfhearted and incomplete,” arguing it’s unclear if the decision was communicated to agency staff or if it will apply to years beyond 2025.

In a 45-page ruling Wednesday, Smith sided with the states and granted summary judgment, calling the policy “both arbitrary and capricious and unconstitutional.”

“Plaintiff States stand to suffer irreparable harm; the effect of the loss of emergency and disaster funds cannot be recovered later, and the downstream effect on disaster response and public safety are real and not compensable,” Smith wrote.

New York Attorney General Letitia James hailed the ruling in a statement, writing: “The federal government cannot prioritize its cruel immigration agenda over Americans’ safety. Today, the court affirmed that it is blatantly unconstitutional for DHS to hold life-saving disaster relief funds hostage to advance its anti-immigration efforts.”

DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin asserted in a statement that cities and states that “break the law and prevent us from arresting criminal illegal aliens should not receive federal funding.”

“The Trump Administration is committed to restoring the rule of law. No lawsuit, not this one or any other, is going to stop us from doing that,” she wrote.

The ruling follows a monthslong gambit by President Trump to punish “sanctuary” cities and states that limit cooperation between the police and Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

The Trump administration argues that those jurisdictions make it harder for ICE to apprehend undocumented immigrants, including accused criminals and people who are in state or local custody. But “sanctuary” cities and states typically argue that requiring them to cooperate with ICE would undermine trust in local police and make some immigrants wary of reporting crimes.

Within hours of returning to office in January, Mr. Trump signed an executive order telling federal agencies to ensure that “sanctuary” jurisdictions “do not receive access to Federal funds.” Since then, several agencies have moved to restrict grants to “sanctuary” cities and states, including the Department of Justice and the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Those moves have drawn lawsuits from Democratic cities and states. Last month, a San Francisco-based judge blocked the Trump administration from cutting off funding to almost three dozen cities and counties, including Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco and Boston.

More from CBS News

Joe Walsh

Joe Walsh is a senior editor for digital politics at CBS News. Joe previously covered breaking news for Forbes and local news in Boston.

Share6Tweet4Share1

Joe Walsh

Related Posts

Senate blocks voting bill’s amendment on trans athletes during weekend session
Politics

Senate blocks voting bill’s amendment on trans athletes during weekend session

March 21, 2026
Airport delays worsen as Congress fails to pass DHS funding bill
Politics

Airport delays worsen as Congress fails to pass DHS funding bill

March 21, 2026
Trump is strategizing means to seize Iran’s nuclear stockpiles, sources say
Politics

Trump is strategizing means to seize Iran’s nuclear stockpiles, sources say

March 20, 2026
Colombian President Petro caught up in narcotics trafficking probes, sources say
Politics

Colombian President Petro caught up in narcotics trafficking probes, sources say

March 20, 2026
Trump administration temporarily lifts sanctions on Iranian oil at sea
Politics

Trump administration temporarily lifts sanctions on Iranian oil at sea

March 20, 2026
Judge strikes down restrictive Pentagon press policy, finding it violates First Amendment
Politics

Judge strikes down restrictive Pentagon press policy, finding it violates First Amendment

March 20, 2026
Next Post
Federal prosecutors near decision on whether to charge James Comey, sources say

Federal prosecutors near decision on whether to charge James Comey, sources say

White House tells agencies to prepare for layoffs if government shuts down

White House tells agencies to prepare for layoffs if government shuts down

Recommended Stories

U.S. appears to prepare for longer fight in Iran

U.S. appears to prepare for longer fight in Iran

March 7, 2026
Trump says operations will “continue until all of our objectives are achieved”

Trump says operations will “continue until all of our objectives are achieved”

March 1, 2026
Trump administration temporarily lifts sanctions on Iranian oil at sea

Trump administration temporarily lifts sanctions on Iranian oil at sea

March 20, 2026

Popular Stories

  • Spanberger backed by 2 former GOP lawmakers in bid to be Virginia governor

    Spanberger backed by 2 former GOP lawmakers in bid to be Virginia governor

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • London home Freddie Mercury bought in 1980 is for sale

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • U.S. sues Harvard, alleging it failed to protect Jewish and Israeli students

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Dolphins make NFL history with 7th straight win over Saints

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Airport delays worsen as Congress fails to pass DHS funding bill

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?