• About
  • Contact
Monday, January 12, 2026
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Three former DOJ officials sue to challenge their Trump-era firings

by Scott MacFarlane
July 24, 2025
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Three former DOJ officials sue to challenge their Trump-era firings

RELATED POSTS

Democrat Mary Peltola launches Alaska Senate bid

Omar says it is “not acceptable” to make early judgments on Minneapolis shooting

Three fired Justice Department officials filed a lawsuit against Attorney General Pam Bondi on Thursday, after they were part of a wave of terminations from the agency earlier this summer.

The plaintiffs in Thursday’s suit include Michael Gordon, a longtime federal prosecutor who also handled January 6 cases. He was fired last month while handling a high-level fraud case against a Florida man accused of fleecing children with special needs out of millions of dollars. The lawsuit says the firing “came as a particular shock” to Gordon because he was picked to help lead that case, and he was “personally congratulated” by officials.

Also joining the suit: Joseph Tirrell, the department’s former top ethics official, and Patty Hartman, a public affairs specialist who oversaw press releases about Jan. 6 cases and helped maintain the content of an online Justice Department database on Capital siege cases.

In their lawsuit, the three officials say they were told of their firings in one-page memos signed by Bondi that didn’t offer any specific reason for the termination. The memos cited Article II of the U.S. Constitution, which lays out the powers of the president. 

The suit argues Bondi and the Justice Department did not follow the normal procedures that govern how and when civil servants can be fired. They ask a judge to order the Trump administration to “immediately reinstate” them as Justice Department employees, and award back pay as needed.

“The Attorney General does not have absolute authority to simply remove DOJ employees. Specifically, there are crucial guardrails that protect employees from arbitrary or unlawful termination,” the lawsuit reads.

On Tirell’s termination, the suit also says he is owed protections as a member of the Senior Executive Service — a category of senior-level government employees who aren’t appointed by the president — and as a Navy veteran.

“Specifically, it is a Prohibited Personnel Practice to ‘knowingly take, recommend, or approve any personnel action if the taking of such action would violate a veterans’ preference requirement,'” the suit read, referring to federal rules that give former members of the military certain preferences in government jobs.

Normally, the suit says, the plaintiffs would be able to go to a federal agency called the Merit Systems Protection Board to appeal their firings. But the MSPB has been hobbled by President Trump’s decision to fire a board member, making any filing there “futile,” the plaintiffs say.

Dozens of Justice Department staffers have been fired, CBS News has previously reported. The firings include prosecutors and officials who worked on the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, as well as people linked to the criminal investigations into Mr. Trump.

Within weeks of Mr. Trump’s inauguration, top officials directed the FBI to put together a list of agents who worked on Jan. 6 cases — a sweeping dragnet since the Capitol riot investigation was the largest in Justice Department history, ensnaring over 1,000 defendants. Meanwhile, Bondi set up a “weaponization working group” tasked with reviewing the two federal criminal prosecutions of Mr. Trump.

After her firing, Hartman blasted the Justice Department in an interview with CBS News.

“There used to be a line, used to be a very distinct separation between the White House and the Department of Justice, because one should not interfere with the work of the other,” Hartman told CBS News. “That line is very definitely gone.”

CBS News has reached out to the Justice Department for comment on the lawsuit.

More from CBS News

Scott MacFarlane

Scott MacFarlane is CBS News’ Justice correspondent. He has covered Washington for two decades, earning 20 Emmy and Edward R. Murrow awards. His reporting has resulted directly in the passage of five new laws.

Share6Tweet4Share1

Scott MacFarlane

Related Posts

Democrat Mary Peltola launches Alaska Senate bid
Politics

Democrat Mary Peltola launches Alaska Senate bid

January 12, 2026
Omar says it is “not acceptable” to make early judgments on Minneapolis shooting
Politics

Omar says it is “not acceptable” to make early judgments on Minneapolis shooting

January 12, 2026
RFK Jr.’s MAHA movement has picked up steam in statehouses
Politics

RFK Jr.’s MAHA movement has picked up steam in statehouses

January 12, 2026
Justice Dept. served subpoenas to the Fed, Powell says
Politics

Justice Dept. served subpoenas to the Fed, Powell says

January 11, 2026
Trump briefed on new options for military strikes in Iran, source says
Politics

Trump briefed on new options for military strikes in Iran, source says

January 11, 2026
Transcript: Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Jan. 11, 2026
Politics

Transcript: Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Jan. 11, 2026

January 11, 2026
Next Post
U.S. Department of Justice sues NYC over sanctuary city laws

U.S. Department of Justice sues NYC over sanctuary city laws

U.S., Mexico agree on steps to solve decades-old Tijuana River sewage crisis

U.S., Mexico agree on steps to solve decades-old Tijuana River sewage crisis

Recommended Stories

French split over Brigitte Bardot tribute due to her far right views

French split over Brigitte Bardot tribute due to her far right views

December 29, 2025
House committee to hold hearing on Minnesota fraud

House committee to hold hearing on Minnesota fraud

January 7, 2026
What we know about the fatal ICE shooting in Minneapolis

What we know about the fatal ICE shooting in Minneapolis

January 7, 2026

Popular Stories

  • California’s construction industry hurt by ICE raids, builder says

    California’s construction industry hurt by ICE raids, builder says

    16 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump decrees any attack on Qatar be treated as threat to U.S.

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Over $120 million in USDA award payments to Minnesota suspended, White House says

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump urges credit card companies to slash interest rates to 10% for one year

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump posted some U.S. jobs data the before its official release

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?