• About
  • Contact
Saturday, May 2, 2026
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Hundreds of National Guard forces deployed to L.A. by Trump could be sent to wildfire duty

by Joe Walsh Eleanor Watson
June 30, 2025
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Hundreds of National Guard forces deployed to L.A. by Trump could be sent to wildfire duty

RELATED POSTS

Trump tightens U.S. sanctions on Cuba, signaling a warning to the island, expert says

What states could try to redistrict and add more GOP seats

A military commander has discussed shifting some California National Guard troops away from the Trump administration’s weekslong deployment to deal with protests in Los Angeles so they can help fight wildfires, two U.S. officials told CBS News.

Gen. Gregory Guillot, the leader of U.S. Northern Command, made the request to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, proposing that 200 out of roughly 4,000 California National Guard members be moved from Los Angeles to wildfire duty elsewhere in California. 

The request to shift some troops to wildfire duty was first reported by The Associated Press. 

The purpose of the possible move is to help prepare for wildfire season, one U.S. official said. The other official said they could be placed on standby to respond to wildfires.

Wildfires can happen at any time of year in California, but they usually peak in the summer and fall. The state expects an “early and active season” this year, with above-average activity in July and August, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, or Cal Fire.

The Los Angeles deployment has been controversial and subject to legal challenges. President Trump called up around 4,000 Guard members — and deployed around 700 Marines — over California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s objections, moves Mr. Trump argued were necessary to protect federal buildings and immigration agents from chaotic protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Newsom argued the deployment was illegal and unnecessary.

When Mr. Trump initially called up the California National Guard to deal with protests, the state had warned the move could interfere with its wildfire response. Guard forces often work alongside Cal Fire crews — and as wildfires become more frequent and severe, state officials have said more resources are needed. Newsom’s office said last week the Guard’s firefighting force was only at 40% capacity due to the Los Angeles deployment.

“This deployment comes when California is in the midst of peak wildfire season for both Northern and Southern California and may need to rely on their crucial support,” the state of California wrote in a lawsuit against the Trump administration over the deployment.

A federal district court judge initially sided with the state in its lawsuit, but a panel of appellate court judges paused that ruling, allowing Mr. Trump to maintain control of the Guard.

The troops were shifted to federal service earlier this month under a law known as Title 10, which lets the president call up National Guard forces during a “rebellion” or if “the president is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.” The Trump administration argued those conditions were met due to threats of violence against immigration agents who carried out arrests in the Los Angeles area.

Newsom objected to the move, and the state quickly filed a lawsuit calling it a “power grab.” The state argued that under the law cited by the administration, Mr. Trump does not have the legal authority to call up the Guard without permission from the governor.

A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ultimately sided with the Trump administration, allowing troops to remain in Los Angeles while the state’s lawsuit is heard. The court wrote that Mr. Trump most likely “lawfully exercised his statutory authority” to federalize the Guard, and that the law “does not give governors any veto power.”

More from CBS News

Joe Walsh

Joe Walsh is a senior editor for digital politics at CBS News. Joe previously covered breaking news for Forbes and local news in Boston.

Share6Tweet4Share1

Joe Walsh Eleanor Watson

Related Posts

Cuba plans to open up to investment from nationals in U.S. amid pressure from Trump
Politics

Trump tightens U.S. sanctions on Cuba, signaling a warning to the island, expert says

May 1, 2026
What states could try to redistrict and add more GOP seats
Politics

What states could try to redistrict and add more GOP seats

May 1, 2026
Tennessee, Alabama take steps to redraw House maps in wake of Supreme Court ruling
Politics

Tennessee, Alabama take steps to redraw House maps in wake of Supreme Court ruling

May 1, 2026
ICE reports 18th detainee death in 2026, putting agency on track for new record
Politics

ICE reports 18th detainee death in 2026, putting agency on track for new record

May 1, 2026
Trump administration to cut 5,000 U.S. troops from Germany
Politics

Trump administration to cut 5,000 U.S. troops from Germany

May 1, 2026
Judge blocks Trump from ending deportation protections for Yemenis
Politics

Judge blocks Trump from ending deportation protections for Yemenis

May 1, 2026
Next Post
Colin Allred will run for Texas Senate seat

Colin Allred will run for Texas Senate seat

Trump threatens Musk subsidies after Musk again targets Trump’s budget bill

Trump threatens Musk subsidies after Musk again targets Trump's budget bill

Recommended Stories

U.S. could send senior officials back to Pakistan for Iran talks within days, sources say

U.S. could send senior officials back to Pakistan for Iran talks within days, sources say

April 17, 2026
Correspondents’ dinner shooting suspect due in court as investigation continues

Correspondents’ dinner shooting suspect due in court as investigation continues

April 27, 2026
Senate rejects 4th attempt to curb Trump’s war powers in Iran

Senate rejects 4th attempt to curb Trump’s war powers in Iran

April 15, 2026

Popular Stories

  • Talks to bail out Spirit Airlines stall as company teeters toward collapse

    Talks to bail out Spirit Airlines stall as company teeters toward collapse

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Trump threatens permanent cuts as shutdown stalemate continues

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Judge declines to unseal grand jury material in Jeffrey Epstein case

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Florida lawmakers visit Alligator Alcatraz after weeks of being denied entry

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Vance appears at secretive donor summit as 2028 presidential speculation grows

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?