• About
  • Contact
Monday, June 16, 2025
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
PRICING
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The US Inquirer
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Supreme Court may announce opinions Friday as TikTok decision looms

by Caitlin Yilek
January 16, 2025
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Supreme Court may announce opinions Friday as TikTok decision looms

RELATED POSTS

Top diplomat in Ukraine gives “damning” testimony

Deal between Turkey and Russia puts offensive in Syria on hold

Washington — The Supreme Court said Thursday that it may announce opinions on Friday morning, a last-minute addition to the schedule that comes just two days before a law that would ban TikTok is set to go into effect.

“The Court may announce opinions on the homepage beginning at 10 a.m.,” a notice on the court’s website said, without specifying what case or cases might be decided. “The Court will not take the Bench.”

The law would cut TikTok off from U.S. app stores and hosting services if it does not cut ties with its China-based parent company, ByteDance, before the Jan. 19 deadline. 

The Supreme Court seemed likely to upload the law when it heard arguments over TikTok’s legal challenge last week, with the justices seeming sympathetic to the government’s claims that China could use TikTok to collect a vast amount of data on its American users and spy on them.

Noel Francisco, who argued on behalf of TikTok and ByteDance, said the potential Supreme Court decision is “enormously consequential” for the platform’s 170 million users in the U.S. and their free speech rights. 

If the law is not paused or overturned by Sunday, “we go dark,” Francisco said last week. “The platform shuts down,” he said, later clarifying that TikTok would no longer be available in U.S. app stores. 

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar said the “unprecedented amounts” of personal data collected by TikTok would give the Chinese government “a powerful tool for harassment, recruitment and espionage.” She cited several data breaches that the U.S. has attributed to China over the last decade, including the hack of the Office of Personnel Management that compromised the personal information of millions of federal employees.

“For years, the Chinese government has sought to build detailed profiles about Americans, where we live and work, who our friends and coworkers are, what our interests are and what our vices are,” Pregolar said. 

In April, Congress swiftly passed the bipartisan legislation, known as the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, as part of a foreign aid package, and it was signed into law by President Biden. It gave TikTok nine months to sever ties with its Beijing-based parent company ByteDance, with the possibility of a 90-day extension if a sale were in progress by the January deadline. Absent a sale, TikTok loses access to app stores and web-hosting services in the U.S. 

Lawmakers and intelligence agencies have long had suspicions about the app’s ties to China and have argued that the concerns are warranted because Chinese national security laws require organizations to cooperate with intelligence gathering. 

TikTok and ByteDance filed a legal challenge in May that called the law “an extraordinary and unconstitutional assertion of power” based on “speculative and analytically flawed concerns about data security and content manipulation” that would suppress the speech of millions of Americans. 

A federal appeals court issued a ruling in December that upheld the law, saying the U.S. government “acted solely to protect that freedom from a foreign adversary nation and to limit that adversary’s ability to gather data on people in the United States.” A week later, the appeals court denied TikTok’s bid to delay the law from taking effect, pending a Supreme Court review.  

On Dec. 16, TikTok asked the Supreme Court for a temporary pause, saying it would suffer “immediate irreparable harm” if the high court did not delay the ban. Two days later, the Supreme Court said it would take up the challenge to the law under an expedited timeline. 

The U.S. Supreme Court


More


More

Caitlin Yilek

Caitlin Yilek is a politics reporter at CBSNews.com, based in Washington, D.C. She previously worked for the Washington Examiner and The Hill, and was a member of the 2022 Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellowship with the National Press Foundation.

Share6Tweet4Share1

Caitlin Yilek

Related Posts

Top diplomat in Ukraine gives “damning” testimony
Politics

Top diplomat in Ukraine gives “damning” testimony

June 14, 2025
Deal between Turkey and Russia puts offensive in Syria on hold
Politics

Deal between Turkey and Russia puts offensive in Syria on hold

June 14, 2025
Trump urges Republicans to get tougher on impeachment
Politics

Trump urges Republicans to get tougher on impeachment

June 14, 2025
Rep. Jim Clyburn reflects on legacy of Elijah Cummings
Politics

Rep. Jim Clyburn reflects on legacy of Elijah Cummings

June 14, 2025
Former Massachusetts governor Deval Patrick reportedly eyes presidential bid
Politics

Former Massachusetts governor Deval Patrick reportedly eyes presidential bid

June 14, 2025
Next phase of impeachment inquiry will be public and televised
Politics

Next phase of impeachment inquiry will be public and televised

June 14, 2025
Next Post
Trump names Mel Gibson, Jon Voight and Sylvester Stallone his Hollywood envoys

Trump names Mel Gibson, Jon Voight and Sylvester Stallone his Hollywood envoys

Trump to install Texas border czar as Border Patrol chief, sources say

Trump to install Texas border czar as Border Patrol chief, sources say

Recommended Stories

The Mueller Report: More legal trouble for Trump

The Mueller Report: More legal trouble for Trump

June 5, 2025
Sen. Amy Klobuchar says Kavanaugh’s history of “excessive drinking” relevant to FBI investigation

Sen. Amy Klobuchar says Kavanaugh’s history of “excessive drinking” relevant to FBI investigation

June 10, 2025
Will trade be an election issue in the midterms?

Will trade be an election issue in the midterms?

June 11, 2025

Popular Stories

  • What to know about the L.A. immigration protests after ICE operations

    What to know about the L.A. immigration protests after ICE operations

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • From Bedroom Dreams to Breakout Success: How Soluh Became One of Roblox’s Fastest-Growing Creators

    18 shares
    Share 7 Tweet 5
  • Trump sets executive order record in his first 100 days

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Transcript: New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” May 11, 2025

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • EPA proposes rollback on rules limiting emissions from fossil fuel power plants

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
The US Inquirer

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Ethics
  • Fact Checking and Corrections Policies
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • ISSN: 2832-0522

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Crime
  • World

© 2023 The US Inquirer

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?